On 22-Apr-00, 12:22 (CDT), Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The relation might be from "on earth", "on same spindle", "same filesystem",
> "same archive", "same ftp server", "same directory", "compiled with
> same compiler" etc - All these are inacceptable as a "contamination"
> clause
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 07:00:23PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 06:21:48PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > But THIS relation (Linked Against) is not really clear from the Terms
> > in Par.9 - It says "distributed along" which KDE + QT2 would also
> > be.
> >
> > IMHO the
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 10:01:54AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > The problem already stated in another
> > mail the problem i had/have with Par.9 is that it doesnt contain
> > a specification/definition under which relations a contamination
> > would be legal/illegal.
>
> It does. "Other softwa
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 06:21:48PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > So the GPL (or QT) license does not "contaminate" until someone actively
> > makes a derived work that combines the (formely seperate) programs.
> > But as long as they are really seperate programs (or contain a special
> > excepti
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 06:21:48PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> But THIS relation (Linked Against) is not really clear from the Terms
> in Par.9 - It says "distributed along" which KDE + QT2 would also
> be.
>
> IMHO the "distributed along" term does not clear the tightness/intense
> of the
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 06:06:29PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> So the GPL (or QT) license does not "contaminate" until someone actively
> makes a derived work that combines the (formely seperate) programs.
> But as long as they are really seperate programs (or contain a special
> exception) they
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:57:03PM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > The paragraph says "License Must NOT Contaminate Other Software".
> > As Debian and the FSF agree that the GPL and QPL are incompatible
> > and this is mainly the cause of the GPL which
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> The paragraph says "License Must NOT Contaminate Other Software".
> As Debian and the FSF agree that the GPL and QPL are incompatible
> and this is mainly the cause of the GPL which requires "the whole work"
> distributed under
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> The paragraph says "License Must NOT Contaminate Other Software".
> As Debian and the FSF agree that the GPL and QPL are incompatible
> and this is mainly the cause of the GPL which requires "the whole work"
> distributed under "THIS license" this means
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:41:59PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:18:14PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > the DFSG Paragraph 9 says:
> >
> > 9. License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
> > [...]
> > A restriction could be that you have to publish all "par
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:18:14PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> the DFSG Paragraph 9 says:
>
> 9. License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
> [...]
> A restriction could be that you have to publish all "parts" of the program
> under the same license as the GPL says - This Discussion h
Hi,
the DFSG Paragraph 9 says:
9. License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
The license must not place restrictions on other software that is
distributed along with the licensed software. For example, the
license must not insist that all other programs distributed on the
The postgresql copyright file contains the following:
The following copyright applies to the regex code in the backend:
Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 Henry Spencer. All rights reserved.
This software is not subject to any license of the American Telephone
and Telegraph Company or of the Reg
13 matches
Mail list logo
