Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:47:21PM +1100, Don Sanders wrote:
> > Firstly I showed him a copy of the GPL:
> > http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> >
> > and then Andreas Pour's interpretation of the GPL:
> > http://lists.kde.org/?/=kde-licensing&m=94950776505266&w=2
> >
Raul Miller wrote:
[ ... ]
> > He is technically literate, and is an avid FreeBSD user and active
> > software developer. He established a BBS in 1983 that later became
> > part of FidoNet and was in service for a total of 14 years.
> >
> > He analysed part of Andreas' interpretation for me free
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 09:38:10PM +1100, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > IMO the contentions lie solely in section 2 of the GPL. Satisfy those
> > requirements and the license would be compatible with the GPL.
>
> I have made an honest effort to locate a thread
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 09:04:02PM +1100, Don Sanders wrote:
> > I the potential for problems with this. For example, directing his
> > attention to certain aspects of the license during lunch, you'd likely be
> > glossing over what I see as the major flaw of Andreas Pour's argument:
> > his conce
4 matches
Mail list logo
