Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "The complete source code for a program which, when running normally,
> consistently includes both QPL and GPL licensed machine code must include
> both QPL licensed source code and GPL licensed source code."
> That concept is central to my argument.
Ex
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 05:26:47PM +0100, Marc van Leeuwen wrote:
> Nobody in this "discussion" is claiming (as far as I can see) that
> by some subtle shuffling of pieces you can get a (composite) program
> from A to B without requiring permissions from all copyright owners.
It seems to me that t
I'll give it just one more shot...
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 06:41:11PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > The GPL has no power to apply to non-GPL'd works which are not derivative
> > in source or binary form from GPL'd works. We have already established
> > th
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 09:04:02PM +1100, Don Sanders wrote:
> I have been researching your comments. Especially the thread containing this
> mail:
>http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-legal-0002/msg00133.html
>
> Am I correct in stating that under your interpretation of the GPL "the
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:53:02PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > > Either the program uses readline or it doesn't. If it does use
> > > > readline,
> > > > and it's distributed with readline, then, strictly-speaking, it contains
> > > > readline.
> >
> > > I disagree.. If it was not built u
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> IMO the contentions lie solely in section 2 of the GPL. Satisfy those
> requirements and the license would be compatible with the GPL.
I have made an honest effort to locate a thread where you explain "the
contentions" but have been unable to do so. Cou
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:47:21PM +1100, Don Sanders wrote:
> > Being concerned with the legality of redistributing KDE linked to QT
> > I consulted a copyright lawyer about Andreas Pour's interpretation
> > given on this list.
> I the potential for probl
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:53:02PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > Either the program uses readline or it doesn't. If it does use readline,
> > > and it's distributed with readline, then, strictly-speaking, it contains
> > > readline.
>
> > I disagree.. If it was not built using one piece of rea
8 matches
Mail list logo
