On Fri, Oct 01, 1999, Mike Gleason wrote:
> Here's the problem with betas 1 to 19: NcFTP includes as one of the
> components, LibNcFTP. This library is also sold as a separate stand-alone
> product. It can't be GPL because my customers use it in proprietary
> in-house applications which they
[Note: I'm moving this to the debian-legal list.]
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am pretty sure that SSH was never free software. Could you show me
> the license on the version that they started with?
I don't know what version they started with. However, the COPYING
file incl
"Mike Gleason" wrote:
> Here's the problem with betas 1 to 19: NcFTP includes as one of the
> components, LibNcFTP. This library is also sold as a separate stand-alone
> product. It can't be GPL because my customers use it in proprietary
> in-house applications which they can't publish comp
Hello Mike,
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 02:42:53PM -0500, Mike Gleason wrote:
> Here's the problem with betas 1 to 19: NcFTP includes as one of the
> components, LibNcFTP. This library is also sold as a separate stand-alone
> product. It can't be GPL because my customers use it in proprietary
>
At 01:41 AM 10/1/99 , Chris Lawrence wrote:
I just downloaded the source code and can't find an actual license
anywhere.
The missing LICENSE file was an oversight, in my haste to get something out
to the Win32 version testers.
Here's the problem with betas 1 to 19: NcFTP includes as one of
On Sep 30, Chris Cheney wrote:
> I just looked at NcFTP 3.0Beta20 and it appears to have changed its
> license to free (no license file) and the libncftp requirement of
> non-use by other programs seems to have been dropped also. Maybe
> someone more knowledgeable than me can look at this and see
6 matches
Mail list logo
