Paul Serice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's interesting. I see what you're talking about, and it would
> make collaboration among projects almost impossible.
For better or worse, Debian doesn't require that arbitrary projects be
able to collaborate. [There are Debian subsets -- e.g. GNU -- w
Mark Rafn wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 1999, Paul Serice wrote:
> > Not too long ago, we had a discussion about the Crafty developer
> > forcing the name. I'm wondering if you think it would be o.k. for him
> > to force the name of only the executable. It would "just require[] a
> > particular name for
Mark Rafn writes:
> The same is true for two programs that require the same filename for
> their license.
That isn't what YAL does. It just requires that certain notices be in a
file named LEGAL.
> How do you include both [sets of legal notices] in your
> combination-product?
You can put the
3 matches
Mail list logo
