Re: OPL

1999-03-09 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Debain-legal folks, > > Hi there. David Wiley from OpenContent here. Let me begin by saying, > 'boy am I glad to hear from you.' Good. We're glad to hear from you, too! > > Several months ago I was trying to gather support for (translation: find >

OPL

1999-03-09 Thread david
Debain-legal folks, Hi there. David Wiley from OpenContent here. Let me begin by saying, 'boy am I glad to hear from you.' Several months ago I was trying to gather support for (translation: find people actually willing to work on) improving the first version of the OPL. Several people said the

Re: Is the OPL DFSG-ok?

1999-03-09 Thread John Hasler
Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > Personally, I wouldn't use it until it has been greatly cleaned up. I agree. I have been assuming that it is just a rough draft. -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Ho

Re: Is the OPL DFSG-ok?

1999-03-09 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Mason, I'm quoting your entire message below for the people at opencontent.org to read. For the people at opencontent.org, please reply to debian-legal@lists.debian.org Marcelo On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:42:04PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > O

Re: Is the OPL DFSG-ok?

1999-03-09 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:22:49PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > You may not charge a fee for the sole service of > > providing access to and/or use of the OC via a network (e.g. the > > Internet), whether it be via the world wide web, FTP, or any other > > method. > > This is non-free. > >