Re: UW gave permission for PINE

1999-03-02 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Paul Nathan Puri wrote: > UW gave me permission to distribute my amateur pine.debs at > http://ompages.com/debian/pkgs/pine/pine.html. > > I'm curious about the nature of the legal controversy over this app. Debian is dedicated to free software and it is not in the business o

Re: UW gave permission for PINE

1999-03-02 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
OK. I'll inquire. NatePuri Certified Law Student & Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ompages.com On 1 Mar 1999, John Hasler wrote: > Paul Nathan Puri writes: > > Is there a reason why debian will not distribute it in the non-free dir > > in package format? >

Re: UW gave permission for PINE

1999-03-02 Thread John Hasler
Paul Nathan Puri writes: > Is there a reason why debian will not distribute it in the non-free dir > in package format? Some developer would have to package it and then apply to UW for permission. So far as I know no one has felt moved to do so. Perhaps you could ask them to extend your permissi

UW gave permission for PINE

1999-03-02 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
UW gave me permission to distribute my amateur pine.debs at http://ompages.com/debian/pkgs/pine/pine.html. I'm curious about the nature of the legal controversy over this app. Is there a reason why debian will not distribute it in the non-free dir in package format? NatePuri Certified Law Stud