Yes. I asked Wietse about it some weeks ago and I understood from his
reply that he is trying to change it.
I've been speaking with some of them and encouraging them too; I'm
glad that Debian folk are also helping. I believe that the developers
in IBM are sincerely trying to solve this pr
On 6 Feb, Dale James Thompson wrote:
> A problem exists with me making a debian package for postilion. The new
> copyright for the graphics files is not compatible with the Debian Free
> Software Guidelines. This means that the postilion package will need to be
> taken out of the Main Debian Di
Nic,
A problem exists with me making a debian package for postilion. The new
copyright for the graphics files is not compatible with the Debian Free
Software Guidelines. This means that the postilion package will need to be
taken out of the Main Debian Distribution and placed in a non-free
dis
I wrote:
> No. However, to use the GPL there must be at least one author who objects
> to the restriction.
Anthony Towns writes:
> Also, invoking the GPL would only say "Hey, no one can distribute this",
> not "Anyone can".
I was assuming the restriction would be removed if one of the authors
co
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 03:50:18PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon writes:
> > A fourth option (which I dislike because it's very treacherous) is to call
> > the GPL into play. I'm sure that statement is not compatible with the GPL,
> > is it?
>
> No. However, to use the GPL ther
5 matches
Mail list logo
