lprng license

1999-01-28 Thread David Frey
Hi, I'm the magicfilter maintainer and just switched to lprng to try it out. It is a nice package, but the license is rather strange (from the lpr manpage): -8< LPRng is distributed under the GNU software license fo

Re: tex4ht - Debian package (fwd)

1999-01-28 Thread Jules Bean
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > ** Please trim the recipient list as appropriate. ** > > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:35:44PM +, Andrew Gray wrote: > > Basically, he would like a licence > > like that for the Knuth TeX programs themselves. > > Basically, the Knuth TeX prog

Re: tex4ht - Debian package (fwd)

1999-01-28 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
** Please trim the recipient list as appropriate. ** On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:35:44PM +, Andrew Gray wrote: > Basically, he would like a licence > like that for the Knuth TeX programs themselves. Basically, the Knuth TeX programs are in public domain, but the name is trademarked. >

Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?

1999-01-28 Thread John Hasler
Brian Ristuccia writes: > I see "sell X" used pretty commonly as "sell X and all rights associated > with X." If what you described was the only common usage, headlines like > "Adobe buys GoLive" or the theoretical "Be, Inc. Buys Microsoft Windows" > would make for pretty boring news articles. But

Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?

1999-01-28 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 07:11:54PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > > If the author meant copy, he should have said copy. > > Yes, he should. However, the usage "sell X" meaning "sell a copy of X" is > common usage. In legal documents prepared by non-lawyers common usage > rules. I see "sell X" u

Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?

1999-01-28 Thread John Hasler
Brian Ristuccia writes: > I phrased this incorrectly. "To sell a software package, a book, or a movie > is to give the recipient all rights to the software package, the book, or > the movie." To sell *the copyright* on a software package, a book, or a movie is to give the recipient all rights to t

Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?

1999-01-28 Thread Henning Makholm
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > As per my previous argument, it's very difficult to tell if you're selling a > copy of the software, or selling your media and duplication services. There IS no difference. "The copy" is simply an alternate phrase that denotes the same physical object

Re: Mgetty should be in non-free?

1999-01-28 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 12:51:39AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Don't say "but the user should know that he means make profit from selling a > > _copy_ of mgetty". If you're an author, you'll find out very painfully the > > difference between selli