Re: French license (for sympa)

1999-01-25 Thread James Troup
[ Sorry for the delay in replying ] Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 5. The data used[2] or produced by the Package are your property and you can > do >whatever you want with it, provided that you do not combine them with the >software to do another distribution. [1] This c

Re: GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Henning Makholm
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, so the gettext version currently in Incoming (which still has many > files saying "this is LGPLed") is illegal, right? No. Many of the standard GNU source trees come this way by themselves (bundled with sources from various GNU libs with the origin

License for DOCs in main?

1999-01-25 Thread Peter S Galbraith
I was looking for the Network Administration Guide in Debian and couldn't find it. I thought this would have been packaged already. So I thought I'd better do it. If this were software, it wouldn't be DFSG-compliant because of its section 2 below. But it's documentation... Can it go in main? T

Re: GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > gettext had a security problem, Bug #28850, which has been fixed by > > Vincent Renardias in gettext_0.10.35-6.1 (NMU). (Thanks Vincent). > > > > However, the fix consisted in copying a set of files f

Re: GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Jules Bean
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > gettext had a security problem, Bug #28850, which has been fixed by > > > Vincent Renardias in gettext_0.10.35-6.1 (NMU). (Thanks Vincent). > > > > > > Ho

Re: GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > gettext had a security problem, Bug #28850, which has been fixed by > Vincent Renardias in gettext_0.10.35-6.1 (NMU). (Thanks Vincent). > > However, the fix consisted in copying a set of files from libc, > which is LGPLed, into gettext, which is GPLed.

Re: GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > gettext had a security problem, Bug #28850, which has been fixed by > > Vincent Renardias in gettext_0.10.35-6.1 (NMU). (Thanks Vincent). > > > > However, the fix consisted in copying a set of files from lib

Re: GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Jules Bean
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hi. > > gettext had a security problem, Bug #28850, which has been fixed by > Vincent Renardias in gettext_0.10.35-6.1 (NMU). (Thanks Vincent). > > However, the fix consisted in copying a set of files from libc, > which is LGPLed, into gettext, which i

GPLed gettext.

1999-01-25 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. gettext had a security problem, Bug #28850, which has been fixed by Vincent Renardias in gettext_0.10.35-6.1 (NMU). (Thanks Vincent). However, the fix consisted in copying a set of files from libc, which is LGPLed, into gettext, which is GPLed. May be this really be done? (I think not). Tha

Re: We distribute LyX?

1999-01-25 Thread joostje
> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is Debian a paying customer here? Is it particularly appropriate for > > > Debian to approach developers in this way? Isn't this something the > > > XForms developers can decide for themselves? > > > > There is no reason why we shouldn't approach the