On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:57:06PM -0700, Ian Greenhoe wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:15 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2005-05-24 13:28:04, schrieb Ian Greenhoe:
> > > There are several solutions that I can see:
> > >
> > > 1) Have the mailserver reject the first delivery attempt by a
Am 2005-05-28 22:49:19, schrieb Chris Bannister:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:57:06PM -0700, Ian Greenhoe wrote:
> > My experience is the *exact* opposite. Personally, I'd rather have to
> > deal with a challenge-response once -- which, mind you, is how you get
> > on this very list -- then have
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Same thing with CC (which I can filter) and I hate Bcc!
Filter on message ID then.
Frankly, I love being cc'd on mailing lists. And I never see
duplicates due to the common procmail trick:
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D
No pills, no pumps - Its the Patch
http://www.jnaz.net/ss/
One more drink and I'll be under the host.
Don't be humble, you're not that great.
Ability is nothing without opportunity.
There are tones of voices that mean more than words.
First weigh the considerations, then
Am 2005-05-28 07:41:07, schrieb Bill Moseley:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Same thing with CC (which I can filter) and I hate Bcc!
>
> Filter on message ID then.
It does not work, because Cc: and Bcc: are faster then the List-Message
and because I have s
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:22:10PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Filter on message ID then.
>
> It does not work, because Cc: and Bcc: are faster then the List-Message
> and because I have seperatet folders, my List-Messages will never reach
> the Folder and I have a broken Archive.
Two diff
Hello List,
i am not able to start the IRda driver on my compaq evo n800c.
Is someone here who can help me step by step ??
my system is an debian sarge 3.1 kernel 2.4.27 on an compaq evo n800c.
Under win 2000 the Ir interface works, but i am not able to make it run
under my linux.
Allways when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
on 5/25/05 2:38 AM, Michael Marsh wrote:
|>On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:15 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
|>The question here is what's less acceptable? A bunch-o-spam or not
|>having non-list subscribers be able to ask questions. I think that
|>the level
On 5/28/05, sascha brossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) spam on a mailing list according to my experience strongly harms
> ~ its perceived quality.
As has been suggested already (implied by my message to which you
responded and then explicitly in another message), sending mail to a
list cou
One stop store for best levitra buy.
http://ewrfwgq.1g4c52juytjr52j.afreshlbbdb.com
All marriages are mixed marriages.
There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else.
If the bloodbath must come, then let's get on with it!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 19:36 +0200, sascha brossmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> on 5/25/05 2:38 AM, Michael Marsh wrote:
> |>On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:15 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> |>The question here is what's less acceptable? A bunch-o-spam or not
> |>having
Bill Moseley wrote:
> Frankly, I love being cc'd on mailing lists. And I never see
> duplicates due to the common procmail trick:
>
> :0 Wh: msgid.lock
> | formail -D 8192 $HOME/msgid.cache
>
> Not too hard to implement.
>
> There's a few reasons why I like them.
Except that there are
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 22:49 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:57:06PM -0700, Ian Greenhoe wrote:
> > My experience is the *exact* opposite. Personally, I'd rather have to
> > deal with a challenge-response once -- which, mind you, is how you get
> > on this very list --
13 matches
Mail list logo
