Op do 30-12-2004, om 21:53 schreef Alexander Toresson:
> then had to configure. Isn't alsa built into the kernel 2.6 and later?
The drivers are part of the kernel, the tools (configuration tools,
players etc.) are not.
> I then tried to use modprobe to install the drivers. Didn't work.
> Output o
Op do 30-12-2004, om 21:53 schreef Alexander Toresson:
>> then had to configure. Isn't alsa built into the kernel 2.6 and later?
>
>The drivers are part of the kernel, the tools (configuration tools,
>players etc.) are not.
>
>> I then tried to use modprobe to install the drivers. Didn't work.
>> O
Pressed the wrong button and didn't reply to the list...
Op vr 31-12-2004, om 13:39 schreef Alexander Toresson:
> So my command should be:
> modprobe snd-cs4236 port=0x530 cport=0x210 dma1=1 dma2=0
You could try:
modprobe snd-cs4236 port=0x530 cport=0x210 irq=5 dma1=1 dma2=0 isapnp=0
Apart from
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:01:13 +0100, Koen Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pressed the wrong button and didn't reply to the list...
>
> Op vr 31-12-2004, om 13:39 schreef Alexander Toresson:
> > So my command should be:
> > modprobe snd-cs4236 port=0x530 cport=0x210 dma1=1 dma2=0
>
> You could
I didn't know the name of the package I wanted to install, so I
searched for it using aptitude. Pressing '+' when standing at the
'alsaconf' virtual package did nothing.
Regards, Alexander Toresson
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:27:35 -0400, Derek Broughton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 30 Dec
I think I'll compose a bug-report. But I don't know where to submit
it. I'll check the main debian page and google for it.
Regards, Alexander Toresson
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:07:40 +0100, Alexander Toresson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:01:13 +0100, Koen Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTE
One of the standard packages in Debian is "reportbug".
Get to a command line, type "reportbug", and it will walk you through
submitting the bug with relevant versions, etc, already included.
Curt-
On Friday 31 December 2004 09:06, Alexander Toresson was heard to say:
> I think I'll compose a bu
Which of the firewall packages is closest to building iptables rules
by hand?
I, for one, prefer to have just one file that contains the iptables
commands to build the firewall. The front-end tools are nice but I
feel like they make me learn about how to run their tool instead of
how to work with
I can not even use the snd-sb8 driver! The cs4237b is compatible with
the sound blaster pro. It seems like the problem is not with the sound
card driver, but with something else. Maybe it has problems accessing
the ports/irq?
Regards, Alexander Toresson
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:06:29 +0100, Alexand
On Friday 31 December 2004 10:54, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Which of the firewall packages is closest to building iptables rules
> by hand?
>
> I, for one, prefer to have just one file that contains the iptables
> commands to build the firewall. The front-end tools are nice but I
That's exactly what
On 1 Jan 2005, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Which of the firewall packages is closest to building iptables rules
> by hand?
>From my experience, firehol is the tool that gets in the way the least.
You can write raw iptables calls with it, in fact, if you really want to
abuse it. Then you only get the 't
Derek Broughton wrote (Fri 2004-Dec-31 11:37:04 -0400):
> ... It's not reflexive
> though - I don't know of a firewall tool that can take a firewall script as
> _input_, so once you modify the script, you can't use the GUI tool any more
> without losing the hand edited changes. If anyone does
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 07:21:35PM +0100, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
> Out of curiosity: What features are expected from a config tool?
> On a laptop computer, you'd seldom need a lot more than to allow
> outgoing, related or established traffic plus incoming SSH,
> wouldn't you?
A friend forgot hi
Hi, Apologies if this is OT.
I have never bought a laptop before and was hoping for some
recomendations.
I am hoping for advice on the following:
1. What gotachas are there? eg. I have found out about a partition you
should keep intact for hibernation mode. Is this OS independant? Or
only for MS
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 11:51:16 +1100 (EST), Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Apologies if this is OT.
>
> I have never bought a laptop before and was hoping for some
> recomendations.
I personally like dell, though I don't know how they in general are
suited for running linux. I'm having a fe
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:51:16AM +1100, Mark M wrote:
1. gotchas / partition for hibernation
The extra partition is just for APM. Use ACPI and swsusp.
It uses your swap part.
Be advised that hiberanation in Linux is extremely problematic.
I don't bother with it.
2. Reliability
3. Battery life
On Friday 31 December 2004 07:51 pm, Mark M wrote:
> Hi, Apologies if this is OT.
>
> I have never bought a laptop before and was hoping for some
> recomendations.
>
What kind of money are you talking? I have a Dell, but if I had my drothers I
would have a Thinkpad.
--
peace,
Alvin Smith
htt
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:32:30 -0500, Alvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of money are you talking? I have a Dell, but if I had my drothers I
> would have a Thinkpad.
I'll second the Thinkpad recommendation. If you're worried about
dropping it, Thinkpads are apparently about the mos
On Saturday 01 January 2005 01:51, Mark M wrote:
> 3. Battery life: I am hoping to use the laptop for 2 things: 1. video
> editing/dvd burning from camera with firewire. 2. Using on longdistance
> flights (but not video editing). I guess for video/burning dvd's I want
> a fast processor eg the pent
Might as well add my 2cents...
I recently did a laptop purchase and settled on a Fuijitsu (C-series). Reason
was that it was rated highly, one of the very few notebooks still made in
quality-central Japan. And it had all the features I wanted (example I may
have opted for an IBM, if they still h
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 09:34:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So if you buy IBM, get it quick.
>
> Dell, I've heard mixed reports about. Some like them and some despise them.
Mine is a Compaq R3275US -- HP still sells a few products under the
Compaq brand. I was very impressed.
You may
For my .02 FRN,
I am right now using a Sony PCG-GRT170. It's a wonderful machine, but
it suffers from all the "unique" aspects of a Sony Vaio machine.
Almost none of the special keys work, hardware volume control, stuff
like that. It all worked under WinXP, which it came with, of course.
But
I'm running a Dell Inspiron I4100 and it has a empty minipci slot
which could take a wireless card. I've looked around a bit and found
a atheros chipset which I think would work with the madwifi drivers
and a few others. Has anyone installed a minipci card in something
similar to the 4100? I'm j
not sure who started the thread so I will just reply to the list
only
I use a Toshiba Satellite 6100 Pro and everything works except the
built-in SD card (which may very well work but I have never taken the
time to try to get it to work cause I have one of those usb all-in-one
card readers).
User Mark M wrote::
Hi, Apologies if this is OT.
I have never bought a laptop before and was hoping for some
recomendations.
[...]
There were some of the Linux-Magazine articles (in 2001 and 2004) about
notebooks and linux tests.
Here is what I found in the archives (in german only):
http://www.lin
25 matches
Mail list logo
