Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
PIII SpeedStep (aka Geyserville) chip?
I've had lockups over the past week I suspect are due to CPU step-speed
changes resulting from power source switching.
--
Karsten M. Self http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part
JRB> We are looking at purchasing a few laptops for the office, and are
JRB> considering Sony VAIO's. Does anyone have any experience with them
JRB> running debian? Potential problems? Suggestions on models/addons?
I have F680K (PIII-700/Rage Mobility 8M/20Mb/192Mb RAM) with extra RAM
plugge
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
> Ah, in this case you will probably have to do something similar to what I
> had to do for one of my machines that was supported by the dri.sourceforge
> branch: I installed the debian XFree86 woody package [just updated to
> 4.03, btw], then fetched
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
> Ah, in this case you will probably have to do something similar to what I
> had to do for one of my machines that was supported by the dri.sourceforge
It is the one named "Radeon" which I have to use for a
~> grep ATI /proc/pci
VGA compatible
Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> It is the one named "Radeon" which I have to use for a
>
> ~> grep ATI /proc/pci
> VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage P/M Mobility AGP
> 2x
> (rev 100).
>
> ??
I don't think so - that looks most likely be an R128.
BTW, you are better to use l
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:33:07PM +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > It is the one named "Radeon" which I have to use for a
> >
> > ~> grep ATI /proc/pci
> > VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage P/M Mobility
> > AGP 2x
> > (rev 100).
> >
> > ??
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Johan Romin wrote:
> Nope.. it's not the r128 chipset. That chip is based on the old RagePro chip,
> which at the moment don't have a working DRI version.
> At least none that I know of.. I still use 3.3.6 and UtahGLX om my RagePro
> based laptop.
What is UtahGLX?
> If some
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> lspci -v on my laptop gives:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Mobility M3 AGP 2x
> (rev 02)
> (prog-if 00 [VGA])
> Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 0155
> Flags: bus master, stepping, fast Back2Back, 66Mhz, medium
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Johan Romin wrote:
>
> > Nope.. it's not the r128 chipset. That chip is based on the old RagePro
> > chip, which at the moment don't have a working DRI version.
> > At least none that I know of.. I still use 3.3
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, if I try to use r128 driver X fails. That's why I doubt that
> this is an r128 - but I'm really unsure. What to do to find it out
> more secure?
It's not a r128-based chip. It's a Mach 64 chip. (Where would you go
to learn this? I dunno...
Hi
Hopefully someone can put me out of my misery with this card
Setup:
Toshiba Tecra 8100
Xircom Realport Ethernet 10\100 + modem 56 REM56G-100
i have installed debian 2.2r3 and it asked to configure pcmcia, no problems
when it comes to configuring network via dhcp , again no problems
when i reb
This card is a little quirky yet. I have the same card and it
does this nearly everytime I bring it up. All I need to do is
# ifconfig eth0 up
and it starts working. Even though the interface already
shows that it's up, I need to remind it manually to get it to
work.
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> PIII SpeedStep (aka Geyserville) chip?
>
> I've had lockups over the past week I suspect are due to CPU step-speed
> changes resulting from power source switching.
>
isn't ther
on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Alexander Clouter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> > PIII SpeedStep (aka Geyserville) chip?
> >
> > I've had lockups over the past we
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 02:28:09PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Alexander Clouter ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > >
> > > Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> > > PII
JRB> We are looking at purchasing a few laptops for the office, and are
JRB> considering Sony VAIO's. Does anyone have any experience with them
JRB> running debian? Potential problems? Suggestions on models/addons?
I have F680K (PIII-700/Rage Mobility 8M/20Mb/192Mb RAM) with extra RAM
plugg
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
> Ah, in this case you will probably have to do something similar to what I
> had to do for one of my machines that was supported by the dri.sourceforge
> branch: I installed the debian XFree86 woody package [just updated to
> 4.03, btw], then fetche
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
> Ah, in this case you will probably have to do something similar to what I
> had to do for one of my machines that was supported by the dri.sourceforge
It is the one named "Radeon" which I have to use for a
~> grep ATI /proc/pci
VGA compatibl
Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> It is the one named "Radeon" which I have to use for a
>
> ~> grep ATI /proc/pci
> VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage P/M Mobility AGP 2x
> (rev 100).
>
> ??
I don't think so - that looks most likely be an R128.
BTW, you are better to use lsp
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Johan Romin wrote:
> Nope.. it's not the r128 chipset. That chip is based on the old RagePro chip, which
>at the moment don't have a working DRI version.
> At least none that I know of.. I still use 3.3.6 and UtahGLX om my RagePro based
>laptop.
What is UtahGLX?
> If someo
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> lspci -v on my laptop gives:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Mobility M3 AGP 2x (rev 02)
> (prog-if 00 [VGA])
> Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 0155
> Flags: bus master, stepping, fast Back2Back, 66Mhz, medium d
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Johan Romin wrote:
>
> > Nope.. it's not the r128 chipset. That chip is based on the old RagePro chip,
>which at the moment don't have a working DRI version.
> > At least none that I know of.. I still use 3.3.6
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, if I try to use r128 driver X fails. That's why I doubt that
> this is an r128 - but I'm really unsure. What to do to find it out
> more secure?
It's not a r128-based chip. It's a Mach 64 chip. (Where would you go
to learn this? I dunno..
Hi
Hopefully someone can put me out of my misery with this card
Setup:
Toshiba Tecra 8100
Xircom Realport Ethernet 10\100 + modem 56 REM56G-100
i have installed debian 2.2r3 and it asked to configure pcmcia, no problems
when it comes to configuring network via dhcp , again no problems
when i re
This card is a little quirky yet. I have the same card and it
does this nearly everytime I bring it up. All I need to do is
# ifconfig eth0 up
and it starts working. Even though the interface already
shows that it's up, I need to remind it manually to get it to
work.
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> PIII SpeedStep (aka Geyserville) chip?
>
> I've had lockups over the past week I suspect are due to CPU step-speed
> changes resulting from power source switching.
>
isn't the
on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Alexander Clouter
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> > PIII SpeedStep (aka Geyserville) chip?
> >
> > I've had lockups over the past w
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:33:07PM +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > It is the one named "Radeon" which I have to use for a
> >
> > ~> grep ATI /proc/pci
> > VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage P/M Mobility AGP 2x
> > (rev 100).
> >
> > ??
>
>
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 02:28:09PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Alexander Clouter
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > >
> > > Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> > > PII
> Suggestion: don't trust WEP. It's another layer of obscurity, but
> it's designed wrong and not at all secure. Some past articles on /.
> have links to papers by people who've broken WEP. I wouldn't trust it
> to keep my spare change secure.
sorry i have to speak up, i'm no huge lover of we
30 matches
Mail list logo
