Anyone,
I just acquired a BayStack 660 Wireless PC Card which uses the netwave_cs
module (according to my docs). I've got the card to load properly as far as I
can tell:
syslog snip:
May 2 11:12:46 localhost cardmgr[212]: socket 1: Netwave AirSurfer Pro
Wireless LAN
May 2 11:12:46 localhost
hi,
i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
"interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
during rcS.d is run ...
any hints/suggens
hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
battery st
hi,
update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
handler ... but still no clue why :(.
so long
Othmar
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
> kernel with noting special in it, not even ap
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Sylvester Keil wrote:
> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
>
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked
> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
>
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
>
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
>
I got no idea why you're getting that problem, but if cardmgr is causing it,
you could switch cardmgr during boot and
HI,
Anyone using Teles PCMCIA ISDN card???
I managed to install the hisax module using slightly different io address:
modprobe hisax type=8 io=0x301 irq=11 protocol=2
but the card doesn't work yet.
After starting the isdnutils and trying the to dial I get a local
hangup after 8 seconds. It doe
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
>
> so long
> Othmar
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
>
hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
> 2.2.19 mo
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Diarmuid Drew wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
> connection on my home network. Under 2.4.2 everything is rock solid but
> 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 are broken. The common error I get is "transmit timeout".
>
> any su
Hello,
Le Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Calum Mackay a écrit:
> CONFIG_APM=y
> # CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
> CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE=y
> CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE=y
I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when id
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> > I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> > for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> > the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few d
Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
> it?
Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
2.4.2.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The world is coming to an en
Sebastien Kalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled !
Yes, that's as designed. Really, that's working, kapmd isn't making
your CPU run active, it _is_ terribly confusing and those
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.
Yeah - ext2 could pretty much be guaranteed to need a fsck after a reboot
on my SMP box under 2.4.2. 2.4.3-ac5 seems Ok though.
--
I am worthless. I struggle with the simple thi
> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! Not really what
> expected.
> May be this was fixed in later 2.4 kernels, I didn't checked.
Yep, as Alan noted, that's normal; it's just the kernel's idle loop. My
kapm-id
hi,
i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
"interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
during rcS.d is run ...
any hints/suggen
hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
battery s
hi,
update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
handler ... but still no clue why :(.
so long
Othmar
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
> kernel with noting special in it, not even a
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Sylvester Keil wrote:
> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
>
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looke
> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
>
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
>
I got no idea why you're getting that problem, but if cardmgr is causing it,
you could switch cardmgr during boot an
HI,
Anyone using Teles PCMCIA ISDN card???
I managed to install the hisax module using slightly different io address:
modprobe hisax type=8 io=0x301 irq=11 protocol=2
but the card doesn't work yet.
After starting the isdnutils and trying the to dial I get a local
hangup after 8 seconds. It do
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
>
> so long
> Othmar
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
>
hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
> 2.2.19 m
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Diarmuid Drew wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
> connection on my home network. Under 2.4.2 everything is rock solid but
> 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 are broken. The common error I get is "transmit timeout".
>
> any s
Hello,
Le Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Calum Mackay a écrit:
> CONFIG_APM=y
> # CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
> CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE=y
> CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE=y
I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when i
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> > I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> > for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> > the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few
Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
> it?
Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
2.4.2.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The world is coming to an e
Sebastien Kalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled !
Yes, that's as designed. Really, that's working, kapmd isn't making
your CPU run active, it _is_ terribly confusing and thos
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.
Yeah - ext2 could pretty much be guaranteed to need a fsck after a reboot
on my SMP box under 2.4.2. 2.4.3-ac5 seems Ok though.
--
I am worthless. I struggle with the simple th
> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! Not really what
> expected.
> May be this was fixed in later 2.4 kernels, I didn't checked.
Yep, as Alan noted, that's normal; it's just the kernel's idle loop. My
kapm-i
33 matches
Mail list logo
