Brendan Simon wrote:
> X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
> directly the kernels fault, it is the new devfs and/or the new input layer
> that
> causes the problem.
Will *not* work for them? I thought it wouldn't work without them, because the
generic poin
Brendan Simon wrote:
> X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
> directly the kernels fault, it is the new devfs and/or the new input layer that
> causes the problem.
Will *not* work for them? I thought it wouldn't work without them, because the
generic pointe
Karsten
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:43:54AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:24:05AM +1100, Brendan Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
> ^^^
> Y
on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:24:05AM +1100, Brendan Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
^^^
You mean 2.2.18?
--
Karsten M. Self http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Ge
Karsten
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:43:54AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:24:05AM +1100, Brendan Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
> > X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
> ^^^
> You
on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:24:05AM +1100, Brendan Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
^^^
You mean 2.2.18?
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://kmself.home.netcom.co
X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
directly the kernels fault, it is the new devfs and/or the new input layer that
causes the problem. Actaully I couldn't get my machine to boot because of
devfs. You need to install devfsd to around the booting problem (if
X will not automatically work for kernels-2.1.18 and 2.4.x. Well it's not
directly the kernels fault, it is the new devfs and/or the new input layer that
causes the problem. Actaully I couldn't get my machine to boot because of
devfs. You need to install devfsd to around the booting problem (if
tom wrote:
>
> Well, I upgraded from stable to testing.
>
> Now X is dead.
>
> I run 'XFree86 -configure' and it locks up like a Windows Box
> would. I have to power down to get it to let go.
> I run 'X -configuer' and I get the same thing..
>
> I've attached a 'tail' of my XFree86.log file.
>
Well, I upgraded from stable to testing.
Now X is dead.
I run 'XFree86 -configure' and it locks up like a Windows Box
would. I have to power down to get it to let go.
I run 'X -configuer' and I get the same thing..
I've attached a 'tail' of my XFree86.log file.
>From a guess, it is missing the
tom wrote:
>
> Well, I upgraded from stable to testing.
>
> Now X is dead.
>
> I run 'XFree86 -configure' and it locks up like a Windows Box
> would. I have to power down to get it to let go.
> I run 'X -configuer' and I get the same thing..
>
> I've attached a 'tail' of my XFree86.log file.
Well, I upgraded from stable to testing.
Now X is dead.
I run 'XFree86 -configure' and it locks up like a Windows Box
would. I have to power down to get it to let go.
I run 'X -configuer' and I get the same thing..
I've attached a 'tail' of my XFree86.log file.
>From a guess, it is missing th
12 matches
Mail list logo
