Re: saving battery by syncing less

Hi Heather, thanks for your comments! On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Heather wrote: > I don't believe I'd seen a reply to this, so here goes. We've had > considerable > threads on this. I did a decent attempt at summarizing the suggestions a bit URL ? Maybe we should suggest an update to the Battery

Re: saving battery by syncing less

Hi Heather, thanks for your comments! On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Heather wrote: > I don't believe I'd seen a reply to this, so here goes. We've had considerable > threads on this. I did a decent attempt at summarizing the suggestions a bit URL ? Maybe we should suggest an update to the Battery-S

Re: saving battery by syncing less

> Hoi one and all, > > I just recently got a Dell Latitude LS, which makes me subscribe to this list. > I am running potato on it, and Kernel 2.2.16. :-))) I don't believe I'd seen a reply to this, so here goes. We've had considerable threads on this. I did a decent attempt at summarizing the

Re: saving battery by syncing less

> Hoi one and all, > > I just recently got a Dell Latitude LS, which makes me subscribe to this list. > I am running potato on it, and Kernel 2.2.16. :-))) I don't believe I'd seen a reply to this, so here goes. We've had considerable threads on this. I did a decent attempt at summarizing the

saving battery by syncing less

Hoi one and all, I just recently got a Dell Latitude LS, which makes me subscribe to this list. I am running potato on it, and Kernel 2.2.16. :-))) Situation: The Battery-Savings-Howto mentions something about starting bdflush/update with a less frequent rate. My laptop apparently does some

saving battery by syncing less

Hoi one and all, I just recently got a Dell Latitude LS, which makes me subscribe to this list. I am running potato on it, and Kernel 2.2.16. :-))) Situation: The Battery-Savings-Howto mentions something about starting bdflush/update with a less frequent rate. My laptop apparently does som