On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:23:32PM +0100, Kurt Sys wrote:
> By the way, I also didn't manage to get sound to work. I get the message
> 'can't locate module snd' (using 'alsa'). I have compiled kernel 2.4.16
> with some sound modules, but I can't 'insmod' all modules (or using
> 'modconf') I woul
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:23:32PM +0100, Kurt Sys wrote:
> By the way, I also didn't manage to get sound to work. I get the message
> 'can't locate module snd' (using 'alsa'). I have compiled kernel 2.4.16
> with some sound modules, but I can't 'insmod' all modules (or using
> 'modconf') I woul
Glen Mehn wrote:
Kurt Sys wrote:
I'll try this, later on, but I think I already tried some of these.
Does make a difference if i include as a module, or directlly into the
kernel? I read sometimes that it's 'better' to compile the things as
modules, but i have not really an idea why... Anyway
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:55, Kurt Sys wrote:
You really only need one package, "smbfs".
I have that one, and also smbclient and some other, but apparently, I
don't need these...
Once that is installed you should be able to mount windows shares wit
Glen Mehn wrote:
Kurt Sys wrote:
I'll try this, later on, but I think I already tried some of these.
Does make a difference if i include as a module, or directlly into the
kernel? I read sometimes that it's 'better' to compile the things as
modules, but i have not really an idea why... Anyway
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:55, Kurt Sys wrote:
You really only need one package, "smbfs".
I have that one, and also smbclient and some other, but apparently, I
don't need these...
Once that is installed you should be able to mount windows shares with:
On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:55, Kurt Sys wrote:
> OK... I'm sorry I didn't no that expression... I'll never forget it. But
> euh, smb is installed, as a module. And I installed several smb-packages
> too. It's just, I can read server-data if i use xsmbrowser, but mounting
> seems not to work..
Kurt Sys wrote:
I'll try this, later on, but I think I already tried some of these. Does make
a difference if i include as a module, or directlly into the kernel? I read
sometimes that it's 'better' to compile the things as modules, but i have not
really an idea why... Anyway, it's worth the e
Quoting Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:20, Kurt Sys wrote:
>
> > OK... problem found, I guess:
> >
> > # Can't locate module iirc
>
> Sorry I should have know better than to be that imprecise. iirc is just
> shorthand for if I remember correctly
On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:20, Kurt Sys wrote:
> OK... problem found, I guess:
>
> # Can't locate module iirc
Sorry I should have know better than to be that imprecise. iirc is just
shorthand for if I remember correctly. Using the regular kernel its just
# modprobe smb
> What's the most '
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 15:23, Kurt Sys wrote:
>> etc, but I can't mount the filesystem, even not as root. I really
>> have
>
> You need the smb filesystem kernel module loaded (modprobe smb iirc).
> And the
> smbfs package must be installed also.
OK... pro
On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:55, Kurt Sys wrote:
> OK... I'm sorry I didn't no that expression... I'll never forget it. But
> euh, smb is installed, as a module. And I installed several smb-packages
> too. It's just, I can read server-data if i use xsmbrowser, but mounting
> seems not to work..
Kurt Sys wrote:
I'll try this, later on, but I think I already tried some of these. Does make
a difference if i include as a module, or directlly into the kernel? I read
sometimes that it's 'better' to compile the things as modules, but i have not
really an idea why... Anyway, it's worth the e
On Thursday 26 December 2002 15:23, Kurt Sys wrote:
> etc, but I can't mount the filesystem, even not as root. I really have
You need the smb filesystem kernel module loaded (modprobe smb iirc). And the
smbfs package must be installed also.
> By the way, I also didn't manage to get sound to wor
Quoting Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:20, Kurt Sys wrote:
>
> > OK... problem found, I guess:
> >
> > # Can't locate module iirc
>
> Sorry I should have know better than to be that imprecise. iirc is just
> shorthand for if I remember correctly
On Thursday 26 December 2002 17:20, Kurt Sys wrote:
> OK... problem found, I guess:
>
> # Can't locate module iirc
Sorry I should have know better than to be that imprecise. iirc is just
shorthand for if I remember correctly. Using the regular kernel its just
# modprobe smb
> What's the most '
Hello,
I'm rather a newbie to Linux (and to this list) and I've been trying
already some different distro's. In my opinion, Debian as (by far) the
best one (I've tried RedHet, Slackware, which I didn't like and SuSe,
which I think is also OK), but there are a few things I can't get right.
I h
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 15:23, Kurt Sys wrote:
>> etc, but I can't mount the filesystem, even not as root. I really
>> have
>
> You need the smb filesystem kernel module loaded (modprobe smb iirc).
> And the
> smbfs package must be installed also.
OK... prob
On Thursday 26 December 2002 15:23, Kurt Sys wrote:
> etc, but I can't mount the filesystem, even not as root. I really have
You need the smb filesystem kernel module loaded (modprobe smb iirc). And the
smbfs package must be installed also.
> By the way, I also didn't manage to get sound to wor
Hello,
I'm rather a newbie to Linux (and to this list) and I've been trying
already some different distro's. In my opinion, Debian as (by far) the
best one (I've tried RedHet, Slackware, which I didn't like and SuSe,
which I think is also OK), but there are a few things I can't get right.
I ha
20 matches
Mail list logo
