Check your /etc/init.d/pcmcia info. There's an entry in there for which
card to use for, say, eth0, eth1, etc. I know that some of the 3com
cards need more than pc_net drivers, and that could be a problem there.
Regards,
Glen
Charles Baker wrote:
>
> I had been running a 3com ethernet card on
Check your /etc/init.d/pcmcia info. There's an entry in there for which
card to use for, say, eth0, eth1, etc. I know that some of the 3com
cards need more than pc_net drivers, and that could be a problem there.
Regards,
Glen
Charles Baker wrote:
>
> I had been running a 3com ethernet card on
Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had been running a 3com ethernet card on a slink w/ some potato install on
> a
> Dell Xpi P133 ST. I had borrowed the card from a friend, so I bought a card
> for myself, a Linksys EC2T. The card seems to be recognized just fine by,
> ifconfig sh
Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had been running a 3com ethernet card on a slink w/ some potato install on
> a
> Dell Xpi P133 ST. I had borrowed the card from a friend, so I bought a card
> for myself, a Linksys EC2T. The card seems to be recognized just fine by,
> ifconfig sh
I had been running a 3com ethernet card on a slink w/ some potato install on a
Dell Xpi P133 ST. I had borrowed the card from a friend, so I bought a card
for myself, a Linksys EC2T. The card seems to be recognized just fine by,
ifconfig shows it has an ip and the other needed configuration.
I had been running a 3com ethernet card on a slink w/ some potato install on a
Dell Xpi P133 ST. I had borrowed the card from a friend, so I bought a card
for myself, a Linksys EC2T. The card seems to be recognized just fine by,
ifconfig shows it has an ip and the other needed configuration.
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in.
> It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked.
> I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card
> stop
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in.
> It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked.
> I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card
> stop
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in.
> It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked.
> I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card
> stop
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in.
> It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked.
> I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card
> stop
I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in.
It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked.
I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card
stopped working. Can someone tell me if they have any specific troubles
with t
I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in.
It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked.
I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card
stopped working. Can someone tell me if they have any specific troubles
with t
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:07:08AM +0100, Raph wrote:
> as in:
>
> (eth0 already configured)
> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up
I'm afraid these options don't quite look right. It's more likely you'd want:
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.25
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:07:08AM +0100, Raph wrote:
> as in:
>
> (eth0 already configured)
> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up
I'm afraid these options don't quite look right. It's more likely you'd want:
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.25
1999 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards
> *- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards"
> >
> > the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I
> > also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its
>
1999 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards
> *- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards"
> >
> > the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I
> > also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its
>
*- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards"
>
> the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I
> also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its
> not quite working right under Linux.
I have a Xircom Realpo
*- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards"
>
> the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I
> also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its
> not quite working right under Linux.
I have a Xircom Realpo
- Original Message -
From: Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Richard Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-laptop
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards
>
> I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it
> has been
- Original Message -
From: Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Richard Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-laptop
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards
>
> I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it
> has been
aliasing an interface:
ifconfig IF:XX new_settings up
as in:
(eth0 already configured)
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up
this will have eth0 as the usual interface, and eth0:0 pointing to the
same hardware nic, but with different network settings.
Ha
aliasing an interface:
ifconfig IF:XX new_settings up
as in:
(eth0 already configured)
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up
this will have eth0 as the usual interface, and eth0:0 pointing to the
same hardware nic, but with different network settings.
Ha
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Larry Clapp wrote:
> Just by the way, you don't *have* to have three cards. I have a
> setup vaguely similar to the one you've described, at least as
> far as how the network looks:
>
>desktop machine (IP addr from DHCP)
> cable modem --- hub -
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Larry Clapp wrote:
> Just by the way, you don't *have* to have three cards. I have a
> setup vaguely similar to the one you've described, at least as
> far as how the network looks:
>
>desktop machine (IP addr from DHCP)
> cable modem --- hub -
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:36:55AM -0800, Richard Weil wrote:
> I'm planning the following setup:
>
> - Dell Inspiron 7000, running Debian w/ firewall options
> compiled into the kernel as the "permanently" connected
> machine.
>
> - On occassion, a second laptop will be networked with the
> Dell
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:36:55AM -0800, Richard Weil wrote:
> I'm planning the following setup:
>
> - Dell Inspiron 7000, running Debian w/ firewall options
> compiled into the kernel as the "permanently" connected
> machine.
>
> - On occassion, a second laptop will be networked with the
> Dell
ia card for my Dell
> > Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards
> > particularly recommended?
>
> I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it
> has been reliable (even under adverse hub conditions) and
> its cord has not been fragile as certain o
ia card for my Dell
> > Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards
> > particularly recommended?
>
> I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it
> has been reliable (even under adverse hub conditions) and
> its cord has not been fragile as certain o
ichard Weil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 11:37 AM
> To: debian-laptop
> Subject: pcmcia ethernet cards
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I
> need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell
> Inspiron 70
ichard Weil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 11:37 AM
> To: debian-laptop
> Subject: pcmcia ethernet cards
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I
> need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell
> Inspiron 70
> Hi,
>
> I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I
> need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell
> Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards
> particularly recommended?
I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it
has been reliable (even
> Hi,
>
> I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I
> need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell
> Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards
> particularly recommended?
I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it
has been reliable (even
Hi,
I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I
need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell
Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards
particularly recommended? Should I get or avoid a
cardbus card? Does anyone have experience with cards
that are ethernet + 56k modems? Are
Hi,
I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I
need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell
Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards
particularly recommended? Should I get or avoid a
cardbus card? Does anyone have experience with cards
that are ethernet + 56k modems? Are
34 matches
Mail list logo
