On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 10:50:09PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:54:15PM -0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > Making a custom build would be a moderately reasonable solution, but how can
> > it actually be done for an ordinary package? No joke, looking at the source
> > tree i
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:54:15PM -0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Making a custom build would be a moderately reasonable solution, but how can
> it actually be done for an ordinary package? No joke, looking at the source
> tree in bzip2-0.9.5d/, created by apt-get source, I can't even find where
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 12:54 PM
To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: package compilation madness
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:04:27AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Apt will assume you want the most up-to-date package, and, since the
> package on th
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:04:27AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Apt will assume you want the most up-to-date package, and, since the
> package on the ftp server is newer than the one you built, it gets
> preferred. The easy solution is to put the package on hold -- but
> this has the disadvantage
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:04:27AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Running on the theory that it might help speed up my Pentium II system
> > (debatable, but that's beside the point), I've tried
> > recompiling a selection of packages with pentium optimi
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Running on the theory that it might help speed up my Pentium II system
> (debatable, but that's beside the point), I've tried
> recompiling a selection of packages with pentium optimisation, downloading
> the debian source and running `./debian/rules bina
> Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Drew> a selection of packages with pentium optimisation, downloading
Drew> the debian source and running `./debian/rules binary`.
Did you actually install them with dpkg -i file.deb?
--
Germano Leichsenring
Kobe University
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 12:47:16PM -0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
[...]
> An irritating problem. Would anyone happen to know why compiled packages
> are getting "upgraded" and replaced in this way?
I don't know why... maybe it's because the packages one makes for oneself
are in no section? Maybe they
Running on the theory that it might help speed up my Pentium II system
(debatable, but that's beside the point), I've tried
recompiling a selection of packages with pentium optimisation, downloading
the debian source and running `./debian/rules binary`.
However, after having done this, every time
9 matches
Mail list logo
