RE: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-10 Thread Charles Baker
I'm using it just because it's the version in Potato. Haven't checked Woody, yet. Since I'm about to upgrade to kernel 2.2.16, I may upgrade the pcmcia as well. >= Original Message From Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >According to Nate Bargmann: >> I have had this problem with b

RE: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-10 Thread Charles Baker
Thanks, I disable the version symbol option in the kernel config. It all works fine this time. Now on to kernel 2.2.16 to fix that security hole, even if no one other than me uses the laptop. >= Original Message From Christophe TROESTLER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Cha

RE: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-10 Thread Charles Baker
I'm using it just because it's the version in Potato. Haven't checked Woody, yet. Since I'm about to upgrade to kernel 2.2.16, I may upgrade the pcmcia as well. >= Original Message From Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >According to Nate Bargmann: >> I have had this problem with

RE: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-10 Thread Charles Baker
Thanks, I disable the version symbol option in the kernel config. It all works fine this time. Now on to kernel 2.2.16 to fix that security hole, even if no one other than me uses the laptop. >= Original Message From Christophe TROESTLER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Ch

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Christophe TROESTLER
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. > Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules > w/ make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't > work. Tried again w/

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Mark Phillips
Charles Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. > Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules w/ > make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't work. > Tried again w/ Configure script pointed

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Christophe TROESTLER
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. > Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules > w/ make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't > work. Tried again w/

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Nate Bargmann
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:58:18PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > According to Nate Bargmann: > > I have had this problem with both kernel 2.2.14 and 2.2.15 using the > > pcmcia 3.1.8-x package. In short, it appears this version of pcmcia > > is broken. > > Um, this may be a stupid question, but

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Nate Bargmann: > I have had this problem with both kernel 2.2.14 and 2.2.15 using the > pcmcia 3.1.8-x package. In short, it appears this version of pcmcia > is broken. Um, this may be a stupid question, but The current version of pcmcia is 3.1.15. Why is _anyone_ still using 3

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Nate Bargmann
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 12:50:17PM -0400, Charles Baker wrote: > Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. > Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules w/ > make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't work. > Tried again w/ C

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Mark Phillips
Charles Baker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. > Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules w/ > make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't work. > Tried again w/ Configure script point

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Nate Bargmann
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:58:18PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > According to Nate Bargmann: > > I have had this problem with both kernel 2.2.14 and 2.2.15 using the > > pcmcia 3.1.8-x package. In short, it appears this version of pcmcia > > is broken. > > Um, this may be a stupid question, bu

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Nate Bargmann: > I have had this problem with both kernel 2.2.14 and 2.2.15 using the > pcmcia 3.1.8-x package. In short, it appears this version of pcmcia > is broken. Um, this may be a stupid question, but The current version of pcmcia is 3.1.15. Why is _anyone_ still using

Re: kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Nate Bargmann
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 12:50:17PM -0400, Charles Baker wrote: > Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. > Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules w/ > make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't work. > Tried again w/

kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Charles Baker
Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules w/ make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't work. Tried again w/ Configure script pointed to earlier on this list, it fails doesn't even

kernel 2.2.15 and pcmcia 3.1.8

2000-06-09 Thread Charles Baker
Has anyone gotten this too work? I downloaded the source packages. Configured my kernel, compiled with make-kpkg, compiled the modules w/ make-kpkg. I got the unresolved symbols errors. PCMCIA doesn't work. Tried again w/ Configure script pointed to earlier on this list, it fails doesn't even