On Thursday 11 November 2004 14:43, Kevin Collins wrote:
I've been struggling for two days trying to get my Compaq Presario
X1029cl to go into hi-res consoles or framebuffer. Until I switched to
kernel 2.6.x, I had always been able to simply add a statement to the
kernel line in /boot/grub/men
i'm using 2.6.8 and grub and i had to put vga=0x318 for 1024x768 16M colors
On Thursday 11 November 2004 14:43, Kevin Collins wrote:
> I've been struggling for two days trying to get my Compaq Presario
> X1029cl to go into hi-res consoles or framebuffer. Until I switched to
> kernel 2.6.x, I had
At Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:23:00 -0500,
H. S. wrote:
>
> Apparently, _Curt Howland_, on 11/11/04 10:13,typed:
> > Unfortunately, although I've been running 2.6 since 2.6.4, the
> > statement "vga=791" in lilo.conf has worked perfectly, just like it
> > did with 2.4.
> >
> > Sorry.
> >
> > On Thurs
Here's another datapoint: 2.6.8 (from a recent Debian Sarge
installation CD) works fine with a Dell Latitude C640, with
``vga=773''.
--
I ... don't want programming to be "really interesting" any more than
I want my toaster to be "really interesting". I want my toaster to
get the job done and I d
Apparently, _Curt Howland_, on 11/11/04 10:13,typed:
Unfortunately, although I've been running 2.6 since 2.6.4, the
statement "vga=791" in lilo.conf has worked perfectly, just like it
did with 2.4.
Sorry.
On Thursday 11 November 2004 09:43, Kevin Collins was heard to say:
Has anyone been able to
Kevin Collins wrote:
video=vesa:mtrr,ywrap,vga=791
video=vesa:mtrr,ywrap,vga=0x317
video=vesafb:mtrr,ywrap,vga=791
video=vesafb:mtrr,ywrap,vga=0x317
video=vesafb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
video=radeonfb:mtrr,ywrap,vga=791
video=radeonfb:mtrr,ywrap,vga=0x317
video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vga=791
> Has an
Kevin Collins wrote:
>
> Has anyone been able to use a 2.6.x kernel and get a hi-res framebuffer?
> Of those that can, can you post the relevent portions of your kernel
> config for me?
I didn't have any problems, vga=791 works fine (with GRUB).
I have attached my whole kernel config, I am too lazy
Unfortunately, although I've been running 2.6 since 2.6.4, the
statement "vga=791" in lilo.conf has worked perfectly, just like it
did with 2.4.
Sorry.
On Thursday 11 November 2004 09:43, Kevin Collins was heard to say:
> Has anyone been able to use a 2.6.x kernel and get a hi-res
> framebuffer
I've been struggling for two days trying to get my Compaq Presario
X1029cl to go into hi-res consoles or framebuffer. Until I switched to
kernel 2.6.x, I had always been able to simply add a statement to the
kernel line in /boot/grub/menu.lst file like "vga=791" to achieve what I
was after.
Not o
Tiago Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi, this is my first post and It's not really laptop specific, but
> since I use debian on my laptop I belive it aplies. I have a compaq
> presario X1000 with an ATI radeon 9200, I instaled the ATI drivers
> and I'm happy with X resolution (1280x800) and 3D, only I can't
Hi, this is my first post and It's not really laptop specific, but since
I use debian on my laptop I belive it aplies. I have a compaq presario
X1000 with an ATI radeon 9200, I instaled the ATI drivers and I'm happy
with X resolution (1280x800) and 3D, only I can't seem to aply the
correct resoluti
Tiago Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi, this is my first post and It's not really laptop specific, but
> since I use debian on my laptop I belive it aplies. I have a compaq
> presario X1000 with an ATI radeon 9200, I instaled the ATI drivers
> and I'm happy with X resolution (1280x800) and 3D, only I can't
>
Hi, this is my first post and It's not really laptop specific, but since
I use debian on my laptop I belive it aplies. I have a compaq presario
X1000 with an ATI radeon 9200, I instaled the ATI drivers and I'm happy
with X resolution (1280x800) and 3D, only I can't seem to aply the
correct resoluti
Hello,
After much googling (with many different search terms), I found a
recent post about matroxfb and kernel-2.6.0-test2:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/7/29/12
The key point is that (for some reason) the fb device needs to be
compiled into the kernel, not as a module. I recompiled 2.6.0-test2
(De
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 06:39, Brian P. Flaherty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I installed the 2.4.21 kernel-image, I gave the radeonfb a try.
> I have an IBM X31 with a Radeon Mobility M6 LY (according to lspci),
> and I really liked the console with the framebuffer. (I liked it so
> much that I starte
Hello,
After much googling (with many different search terms), I found a
recent post about matroxfb and kernel-2.6.0-test2:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/7/29/12
The key point is that (for some reason) the fb device needs to be
compiled into the kernel, not as a module. I recompiled 2.6.0-test2
(De
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 06:39, Brian P. Flaherty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I installed the 2.4.21 kernel-image, I gave the radeonfb a try.
> I have an IBM X31 with a Radeon Mobility M6 LY (according to lspci),
> and I really liked the console with the framebuffer. (I liked it so
> much that I starte
Hello,
When I installed the 2.4.21 kernel-image, I gave the radeonfb a try.
I have an IBM X31 with a Radeon Mobility M6 LY (according to lspci),
and I really liked the console with the framebuffer. (I liked it so
much that I started to learn screen.)
However, I was also quite interested in get
Hello,
When I installed the 2.4.21 kernel-image, I gave the radeonfb a try.
I have an IBM X31 with a Radeon Mobility M6 LY (according to lspci),
and I really liked the console with the framebuffer. (I liked it so
much that I started to learn screen.)
However, I was also quite interested in get
19 matches
Mail list logo
