On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:34:50 +0200
Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still don't understand if I need pcmcia-cs to get pcmcia support in
> 2.5.x or not.
Yes, you do; the Debian binary package pcmcia-cs will provide the utilities
(like cardmgr) you need.
Since the driver modules will be i
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 09:06:50AM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> Thanks for posting that. It looks like the kernel interface for pcmcia has
> changed in some way; I don't know about that. The pcmcia-cs configuration is
> still the same.
>
I still don't understand if I need pcmcia-cs to get pcmc
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:28:37 +0200
Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 08:28:49PM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
>
> > Why do you believe pcmcia-cs configuration has changed?
> >
>
>
> pcmcia howto> The kernel PCMCIA code has the same functionality as
> pcmcia
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 08:28:49PM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> Why do you believe pcmcia-cs configuration has changed?
>
pcmcia howto> The kernel PCMCIA code has the same functionality as
pcmcia howto> the driver side of the pcmcia-cs package. It does
pcmcia howto> not eliminate
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:52:14 +0200
Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to try out the 2.5.x kernel tree to see if my Netgear MA401
> wlan card will work any better than under 2.4.20.
>
> I think that the configuration process for pcmcia-cs has changed since
> 2.4.x. Any suggested rea
I want to try out the 2.5.x kernel tree to see if my Netgear MA401
wlan card will work any better than under 2.4.20.
I think that the configuration process for pcmcia-cs has changed since
2.4.x. Any suggested reading out there? Any one who's gone through
this?
alex
--
Alex Polite
http://plus
6 matches
Mail list logo