On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:55, Thorsten Hirsch wrote:
> > In the documentation for framebuffer (I think -- sorry it was a couple
> > of days ago that I read it) it seems to say something like "if you set a
> > video mode other than VGA-standard in your lilo.conf, you will not be
> > able to switch to a
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:55, Thorsten Hirsch wrote:
> > In the documentation for framebuffer (I think -- sorry it was a couple
> > of days ago that I read it) it seems to say something like "if you set a
> > video mode other than VGA-standard in your lilo.conf, you will not be
> > able to switch to a
Soren A wrote:
In the documentation for framebuffer (I think -- sorry it was a couple
of days ago that I read it) it seems to say something like "if you set a
video mode other than VGA-standard in your lilo.conf, you will not be
able to switch to another video mode later (after login)". I couldn
Soren A wrote:
In the documentation for framebuffer (I think -- sorry it was a couple
of days ago that I read it) it seems to say something like "if you set a
video mode other than VGA-standard in your lilo.conf, you will not be
able to switch to another video mode later (after login)". I couldn'
Thorsten Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 26 Jan 2003
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> cyn wrote:
>> indeed I have compiled it in - kernel 2.4.20, but it doesn't show up
>> any differently - are you sure your append matches that exactly?
>
> In my lilo.conf, under the section of my kernel, it
Thorsten Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 26 Jan 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> cyn wrote:
>> indeed I have compiled it in - kernel 2.4.20, but it doesn't show up
>> any differently - are you sure your append matches that exactly?
>
> In my lilo.conf, under the secti
Hi,
> figure a way to use burning with it still in ide mode - this could be a
> weird bunch of stuff, or perhaps using ide-scsi as a module and somehow
> forcing reinit of /dev/hdc (is this possible? seems like the best method)
actually, lately on freshmeat a new release of cdrecord was announced
Hi,
> figure a way to use burning with it still in ide mode - this could be a
> weird bunch of stuff, or perhaps using ide-scsi as a module and somehow
> forcing reinit of /dev/hdc (is this possible? seems like the best method)
actually, lately on freshmeat a new release of cdrecord was announced
cyn wrote:
indeed I have compiled it in - kernel 2.4.20, but it doesn't show up any
differently - are you sure your append matches that exactly?
In my lilo.conf, under the section of my kernel, it says
--
append="video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x16,mem:12288"
--
I've got X with DFI and the
cyn wrote:
indeed I have compiled it in - kernel 2.4.20, but it doesn't show up any
differently - are you sure your append matches that exactly?
In my lilo.conf, under the section of my kernel, it says
--
append="video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x16,mem:12288"
--
I've got X with DFI and the w
indeed I have compiled it in - kernel 2.4.20, but it doesn't show up any
differently - are you sure your append matches that exactly? I tried
various combinations figuring I must have typed something wrong.
I've got X with DFI and the whole 'shebang' working and playing DVDs - so
I know the sisfb
indeed I have compiled it in - kernel 2.4.20, but it doesn't show up any
differently - are you sure your append matches that exactly? I tried
various combinations figuring I must have typed something wrong.
I've got X with DFI and the whole 'shebang' working and playing DVDs - so
I know the sisfb
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x16,mem:12288
This is a special parameter that can only be used if you have compiled
your kernel with the sis framebuffer driver from www.winischhofer.net.
It supports sis chipsets only and works for me very wel
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x16,mem:12288
This is a special parameter that can only be used if you have compiled
your kernel with the sis framebuffer driver from www.winischhofer.net.
It supports sis chipsets only and works for me very well
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 06:16:32PM +, Soren A wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 23 Jan 2003
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look
> >
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 06:16:32PM +, Soren A wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 23 Jan 2003
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look
> >> different? I have
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 06:16:32PM +, Soren A wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 23 Jan 2003
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look
> >
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:16, Soren A wrote:
> > Try "vga=791".
>
> Since I cannot see any obvious correlation between this "791" and the
> parameters given above (which I didn't know one could do, having just read
> everything on LILO I could get my hands on, 12 hours ago), could you please
> elabora
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 06:16:32PM +, Soren A wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 23 Jan 2003
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look
> >> different? I have
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:16, Soren A wrote:
> > Try "vga=791".
>
> Since I cannot see any obvious correlation between this "791" and the
> parameters given above (which I didn't know one could do, having just read
> everything on LILO I could get my hands on, 12 hours ago), could you please
> elabora
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 23 Jan 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
>>
>> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look
>> different? I have sisfb compiled in and my append includes:
>> v
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote around 23 Jan 2003
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
>>
>> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look
>> different? I have sisfb compiled in and my append includes:
>> video=sisfb:mode:1024
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
>
> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look different? I
> have sisfb compiled in and my append includes:
> video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x16,mem:12288
> which seems to me like it should be setting the console to a high
>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0500, cyn wrote:
>
> Oh, one last thing - shouldn't a high-resolution console look different? I
> have sisfb compiled in and my append includes:
> video=sisfb:mode:1024x768x16,mem:12288
> which seems to me like it should be setting the console to a high
>
So I got a new laptop recently (the aforementioned Sotec 3120x, howto will
be coming in a bit time permitting) and I was going around setting
everything up and optimizing - as one is want to do.
I got dvd playback working - the audio would have to resync every couple
of seconds - so I used hdparm
So I got a new laptop recently (the aforementioned Sotec 3120x, howto will
be coming in a bit time permitting) and I was going around setting
everything up and optimizing - as one is want to do.
I got dvd playback working - the audio would have to resync every couple
of seconds - so I used hdparm
26 matches
Mail list logo
