Daniel Pittman wrote:
> The OP didn't mention anything about boot time, though, and the most
> commonly cited reason for a custom kernel (in my experience) is "speed",
> where the poster assumes that a generic kernel must, necessarily, be
> slower than a custom one.
That was my assumption as well
Erik Sundin writes:
> Den Wednesday
> 08 April 2009 03.44.30 skrev Daniel Pittman:
>> Preston Boyington writes:
>> > After happily using my laptop for the last couple years I've decided to
>> > streamline it a good bit. My hard disk that contains the existing Debian
>> > Sid install has been rep
Den Wednesday 08 April 2009 03.44.30 skrev Daniel Pittman:
> Preston Boyington writes:
> > After happily using my laptop for the last couple years I've decided
> > to streamline it a good bit. My hard disk that contains the existing
> > Debian Sid install has been replaced with a clean drive.
> >
Preston Boyington writes:
> After happily using my laptop for the last couple years I've decided
> to streamline it a good bit. My hard disk that contains the existing
> Debian Sid install has been replaced with a clean drive.
>
> I believe I could get some speed with a custom kernel
That is ex
After happily using my laptop for the last couple years I've decided to
streamline it a good bit. My hard disk that contains the existing
Debian Sid install has been replaced with a clean drive.
I believe I could get some speed with a custom kernel and would like to
know how much trouble it will
5 matches
Mail list logo
