On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Dennis Breithaupt wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar problem with 2.6.x kernels using my sitecom
wireless LAn cards. In this case (sitecom one using acx111 chipset) the
card is cardbus rather than PCMCIA card. To get the card recognised using
kernel 2.4.25 I compiled the kernel
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Dennis Breithaupt wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar problem with 2.6.x kernels using my sitecom
wireless LAn cards. In this case (sitecom one using acx111 chipset) the
card is cardbus rather than PCMCIA card. To get the card recognised using
kernel 2.4.25 I compiled the kernel
Thanks to Derek and Neal for the fix. Changing to PCIC=yenta_socket
fixed the problem and the card is working again now. Thanks to you
both.
To answer Derek's question:
--- Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I read where the new pcmcia required hotplug, so I installed the
> > hotplug
Thanks to Derek and Neal for the fix. Changing to PCIC=yenta_socket
fixed the problem and the card is working again now. Thanks to you
both.
To answer Derek's question:
--- Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I read where the new pcmcia required hotplug, so I installed the
> > hotplug
> My pcmcia network card stopped working when I upgraded from kernel
> 2.2.20 to 2.4.19. I upgraded the kernel by apt-get install:
> kernel-image-2.4.19-686
> kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.19-686
>
> I read where the new pcmcia required hotplug, so I installed the
> hotplug package but it still does n
> My pcmcia network card stopped working when I upgraded from kernel
> 2.2.20 to 2.4.19. I upgraded the kernel by apt-get install:
> kernel-image-2.4.19-686
> kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.19-686
>
> I read where the new pcmcia required hotplug, so I installed the
> hotplug package but it still does n
> Sounds like your card is recognised as being some sort of PCNET variant,
> but you will need to build a "binary-modules" target from the 3.1.25
> source. The pcmcia-cs source will build either or both packages for you
> - take a look at the debian/rules file for what targets are valid. From
>
> Sounds like your card is recognised as being some sort of PCNET variant,
> but you will need to build a "binary-modules" target from the 3.1.25
> source. The pcmcia-cs source will build either or both packages for you
> - take a look at the debian/rules file for what targets are valid. Fro
Robert Voigt wrote:
>
> > pcnet_cs: sorry, the AX88190 chipset is not supported.
> > pcnet_cs: unable to read hardware net address for io
> > base 0x300
>
> I have the same problem, I'm getting this same message.
> I have a W-Linx Linx Pro 10/100 Card. It's listed as supported in the
> pcmcia-
> pcnet_cs: sorry, the AX88190 chipset is not supported.
> pcnet_cs: unable to read hardware net address for io
> base 0x300
I have the same problem, I'm getting this same message.
I have a W-Linx Linx Pro 10/100 Card. It's listed as supported in the
pcmcia-cs-3.1.25 list of supported cards, but
Robert Voigt wrote:
>
> > pcnet_cs: sorry, the AX88190 chipset is not supported.
> > pcnet_cs: unable to read hardware net address for io
> > base 0x300
>
> I have the same problem, I'm getting this same message.
> I have a W-Linx Linx Pro 10/100 Card. It's listed as supported in the
> pcmcia
> pcnet_cs: sorry, the AX88190 chipset is not supported.
> pcnet_cs: unable to read hardware net address for io
> base 0x300
I have the same problem, I'm getting this same message.
I have a W-Linx Linx Pro 10/100 Card. It's listed as supported in the
pcmcia-cs-3.1.25 list of supported cards,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:06:00PM -, Gu?mundur Erlingsson wrote:
> Ok, I've managed to get a bit closer to the root of the problem. When I
> played a bit more with the cardctl utility I found out that the card seems
> to actually have a Asix AX88190 PCI chip, and when I checked the pcmcia-cs
>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:06:00PM -, Gu?mundur Erlingsson wrote:
> Ok, I've managed to get a bit closer to the root of the problem. When I
> played a bit more with the cardctl utility I found out that the card seems
> to actually have a Asix AX88190 PCI chip, and when I checked the pcmcia-cs
Ok, I've managed to get a bit closer to the root of the problem. When I
played a bit more with the cardctl utility I found out that the card seems
to actually have a Asix AX88190 PCI chip, and when I checked the pcmcia-cs
homepage, it seems support for that chipset was removed a while ago.
However,
Ok, I've managed to get a bit closer to the root of the problem. When I
played a bit more with the cardctl utility I found out that the card seems
to actually have a Asix AX88190 PCI chip, and when I checked the pcmcia-cs
homepage, it seems support for that chipset was removed a while ago.
However
16 matches
Mail list logo
