On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:51:10AM -0600, RRPotratz wrote:
> >>I posed my 2.4.x eraser head problem on a Mepis forum and the only
> >>response I got was "don't use 2.4.x, use 2.6.x".
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> You are correct. The eraser head does *not* work with 2.4.x in Mepis.
> As I was thinking th
RRPotratz wrote:
Willie McKemie wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:47:30AM -0600, RRPotratz wrote:
Interesting. Mine worked off the bat with 2.4.x. There are some
issues with it though, as I remember reading something about it on
the Mepis site (either mepis.org or mepislovers.org). My issue
Willie McKemie wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:47:30AM -0600, RRPotratz wrote:
Interesting. Mine worked off the bat with 2.4.x. There are some issues
with it though, as I remember reading something about it on the Mepis
site (either mepis.org or mepislovers.org). My issue started when I
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:47:30AM -0600, RRPotratz wrote:
> Interesting. Mine worked off the bat with 2.4.x. There are some issues
> with it though, as I remember reading something about it on the Mepis
> site (either mepis.org or mepislovers.org). My issue started when I
> wanted to switch
Willie McKemie wrote:
In testing current versions of both Mepis and Ubuntu, I find that both
have this problem on a Compaq Armada 7400:
kernel 2.6.x works fine.
kernel 2.4.x fails to properly handle the "eraser head" pointing
device.
This is surprising since numerous other distributions do handle
5 matches
Mail list logo
