Re: C/R

2005-07-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ian Greenhoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> No. C-R is spam. > > B**t. It is not. It can be misused, it can be badly programmed, > but it is not inherently, in and of itself, not spam. It can't be guarded against misuse by viruses using someone elses valid email. And it just anoyes the tru

Re: C/R (was: Re: *** bluber *** Re: Male xxxxxx enhancement formula^)

2005-07-18 Thread Ian Greenhoe
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 03:22 -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:34:22AM -0700, Ian Greenhoe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 16:34 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > > There has been heated debate on comp.mail.misc about C/R systems. > > > > > > Th

Re: C/R (was: Re: *** bluber *** Re: Male xxxxxx enhancement formula^)

2005-07-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Karsten M. Self" writes: > on Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:34:22AM -0700, Ian Greenhoe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: >> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 16:34 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: >> > "Challenge-Response system is based on false assumption that sender's >> > address can be used for authentication. It