On 1 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes it is, just don't load up processor.ko once you have compiled in
> ACPI.
I just compiled the 2.4.24 kernel with acpi support without the
processor support and it seems to work, at least the batteries status
is displayed. However suspend, sta
On 1 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes it is, just don't load up processor.ko once you have compiled in
> ACPI.
I just tried it with the 2.4.24 kernel, put ACPI support monolithic in
and adding batterie, fan, button and processor support the kernel and
rebooted, alas the boot process stopp
On 1 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes it is, just don't load up processor.ko once you have compiled in
> ACPI.
I just compiled the 2.4.24 kernel with acpi support without the
processor support and it seems to work, at least the batteries status
is displayed. However suspend, sta
On 1 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes it is, just don't load up processor.ko once you have compiled in
> ACPI.
I just tried it with the 2.4.24 kernel, put ACPI support monolithic in
and adding batterie, fan, button and processor support the kernel and
rebooted, alas the boot process stopp
Yes it is, just don't load up processor.ko once you have compiled in
ACPI.
ACPI on the r40e will give you the ability to view battery life and if
you compile in cpufreq support you can also use powernowd to cycle the
processor power usage and save your battery life. My processor is
running at 250
Yes it is, just don't load up processor.ko once you have compiled in
ACPI.
ACPI on the r40e will give you the ability to view battery life and if
you compile in cpufreq support you can also use powernowd to cycle the
processor power usage and save your battery life. My processor is
running at 250
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
...
> > Also you may check the lilo.conf : append="apm=on acpi=off"
...
> I try this one then, thanks
The other posting is right
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
...
> > Also you may check the lilo.conf : append="apm=on acpi=off"
...
> I try this one then, thanks
The other posting is right
On 30 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> I run make xonfig, selected monolitic apm support, run make dep,
>> make bzImage and configured lilo.conf.
>>
>> When booting the new kernel to my surprise apm -s gave me the same
>> result:
>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I run make xonfig, selected monolitic apm support,
> run make dep, make bzImage and configured lilo.conf.
>
> When booting the new kernel to my surprise
> apm -s gave me the same result:
>
> No APM support in the kernel!
You didn't me
On 30 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Quite simply there are R40's that do support APM. However, the R40e
> is not one of them. So, the short answer is that you cannot use APM
> with any kernel on an R40e. You must use ACPI, and there are
> problems with the processor.o and ther
Hi there,
Quite simply there are R40's that do support APM. However, the R40e is
not one of them. So, the short answer is that you cannot use APM with
any kernel on an R40e. You must use ACPI, and there are problems with
the processor.o and thermal.o modules on that machine as well.
Sorry
Pete
On 30 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> I run make xonfig, selected monolitic apm support, run make dep,
>> make bzImage and configured lilo.conf.
>>
>> When booting the new kernel to my surprise apm -s gave me the same
>> result:
>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I run make xonfig, selected monolitic apm support,
> run make dep, make bzImage and configured lilo.conf.
>
> When booting the new kernel to my surprise
> apm -s gave me the same result:
>
> No APM support in the kernel!
You didn't me
On 30 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Quite simply there are R40's that do support APM. However, the R40e
> is not one of them. So, the short answer is that you cannot use APM
> with any kernel on an R40e. You must use ACPI, and there are
> problems with the processor.o and ther
Hi there,
Quite simply there are R40's that do support APM. However, the R40e is
not one of them. So, the short answer is that you cannot use APM with
any kernel on an R40e. You must use ACPI, and there are problems with
the processor.o and thermal.o modules on that machine as well.
Sorry
Pete
16 matches
Mail list logo
