Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-08 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in. > It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked. > I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card > stop

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-08 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in. > It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked. > I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card > stop

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-07 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in. > It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked. > I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card > stop

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-07 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:50:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a toshiba satellite 400CDT that I use an IBM PCMICA ethercard in. > It was working in kernel 2.0.36. I upgraded to potato and it still worked. > I then downloaded and reconfigured 2.2.13 kernel and the ethernet card > stop

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread Yann Vernier
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:07:08AM +0100, Raph wrote: > as in: > > (eth0 already configured) > ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up I'm afraid these options don't quite look right. It's more likely you'd want: ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.25

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread Yann Vernier
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:07:08AM +0100, Raph wrote: > as in: > > (eth0 already configured) > ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up I'm afraid these options don't quite look right. It's more likely you'd want: ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.25

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread David Corbin
1999 8:18 PM Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards > *- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards" > > > > the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I > > also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its >

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread David Corbin
1999 8:18 PM Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards > *- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards" > > > > the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I > > also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its >

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards" > > the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I > also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its > not quite working right under Linux. I have a Xircom Realpo

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 2 Dec, David Corbin wrote about "re: pcmcia ethernet cards" > > the brand that you don't have to buy replacements for. OTOH, I > also have a Xircom Realport. Now THAT is nice. Unfortunately, its > not quite working right under Linux. I have a Xircom Realpo

re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread David Corbin
- Original Message - From: Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Richard Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-laptop Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:45 PM Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards > > I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it > has been

re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread David Corbin
- Original Message - From: Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Richard Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-laptop Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:45 PM Subject: Re: pcmcia ethernet cards > > I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it > has been

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread Raph
aliasing an interface: ifconfig IF:XX new_settings up as in: (eth0 already configured) ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up this will have eth0 as the usual interface, and eth0:0 pointing to the same hardware nic, but with different network settings. Ha

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-03 Thread Raph
aliasing an interface: ifconfig IF:XX new_settings up as in: (eth0 already configured) ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.2.1 network 192.168.2.255 broadcast 255.255.255.0 up this will have eth0 as the usual interface, and eth0:0 pointing to the same hardware nic, but with different network settings. Ha

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Steve Robbins
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Larry Clapp wrote: > Just by the way, you don't *have* to have three cards. I have a > setup vaguely similar to the one you've described, at least as > far as how the network looks: > >desktop machine (IP addr from DHCP) > cable modem --- hub -

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Steve Robbins
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Larry Clapp wrote: > Just by the way, you don't *have* to have three cards. I have a > setup vaguely similar to the one you've described, at least as > far as how the network looks: > >desktop machine (IP addr from DHCP) > cable modem --- hub -

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Larry Clapp
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:36:55AM -0800, Richard Weil wrote: > I'm planning the following setup: > > - Dell Inspiron 7000, running Debian w/ firewall options > compiled into the kernel as the "permanently" connected > machine. > > - On occassion, a second laptop will be networked with the > Dell

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Larry Clapp
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:36:55AM -0800, Richard Weil wrote: > I'm planning the following setup: > > - Dell Inspiron 7000, running Debian w/ firewall options > compiled into the kernel as the "permanently" connected > machine. > > - On occassion, a second laptop will be networked with the > Dell

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Glen S Mehn
I'm using a Netgear FA-410 that I accidentally bought for an old company. Strangely enough, it's 10/100, none of the dongles have broken (4 out of 4 in a year), it's supported by pcnet_cs, and seems to be pretty nice. I use it all over, and it has never compained. Works in slink and potato. And it

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Glen S Mehn
I'm using a Netgear FA-410 that I accidentally bought for an old company. Strangely enough, it's 10/100, none of the dongles have broken (4 out of 4 in a year), it's supported by pcnet_cs, and seems to be pretty nice. I use it all over, and it has never compained. Works in slink and potato. And it

RE: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Charles H. Baker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If I were you I would get an old 486 ( http://www.retrobox.com for as little as $35 ) or PentiumI and put 95 on it and let your provider set up the dsl to it. This is what I did before Bellsouth came to set up mine. Then I would create an LRP boot fl

RE: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Charles H. Baker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If I were you I would get an old 486 ( http://www.retrobox.com for as little as $35 ) or PentiumI and put 95 on it and let your provider set up the dsl to it. This is what I did before Bellsouth came to set up mine. Then I would create an LRP boot fl

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Heather
> Hi, > > I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I > need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell > Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards > particularly recommended? I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it has been reliable (even under adverse hub co

Re: pcmcia ethernet cards

1999-12-02 Thread Heather
> Hi, > > I should be getting DSL service in a few weeks so I > need to get an Ethernet pcmcia card for my Dell > Inspiron 7000. Are there any pcmcia ethernet cards > particularly recommended? I use a Dlink that has been supported for a long time - it has been reliable (even under adverse hub co