Dear Sir,
I have a toshiba laptop. (Satellite 4020 cdt). I have
to buy a ethernet card for this for the dsl line
connection. Coould you please tell me if there is a
particular configuration i must look for (only for
laptops), and as to where i can buy and one. Can i
install it myself ?
Thanking Y
Dear Sir,
I have a toshiba laptop. (Satellite 4020 cdt). I have
to buy a ethernet card for this for the dsl line
connection. Coould you please tell me if there is a
particular configuration i must look for (only for
laptops), and as to where i can buy and one. Can i
install it myself ?
Thanking
A once-over always configures
It's so easy, it figures
I still remember spending 12 hours trying to figure out how to make my
AWE64 sound card work on my desktop. Finally, I found an obscure
suggestion to change "dma1=5" to "dma16=5". It figures!
-AS
Andreas Tscharner wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi all,
Hi again,
>
> Today I've updated my system, and there were also a new pcmcia package.
> After compiling the new modules, my ethernet card is no longer configured
> (it worked before).
> As I've seen in /var/log/messages the card has been found, and when I
> manually configure it (ifc
A once-over always configures
It's so easy, it figures
I still remember spending 12 hours trying to figure out how to make my
AWE64 sound card work on my desktop. Finally, I found an obscure
suggestion to change "dma1=5" to "dma16=5". It figures!
-AS
Andreas Tscharner wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all
>
> Hi all,
Hi again,
>
> Today I've updated my system, and there were also a new pcmcia package.
> After compiling the new modules, my ethernet card is no longer configured
> (it worked before).
> As I've seen in /var/log/messages the card has been found, and when I
> manually configure it (if
I have noticed the problem too with the same card. I have discovered that it
usually takes a minute or two after boot up for the card to be fully
initialized. I used to do the /etc/pcmcia/network start/stop thing too. Not
any more :-). Now I just get myself some coffee, and it's ready when i get
ba
I have noticed the problem too with the same card. I have discovered that it
usually takes a minute or two after boot up for the card to be fully
initialized. I used to do the /etc/pcmcia/network start/stop thing too. Not
any more :-). Now I just get myself some coffee, and it's ready when i get
b
Jens Helweg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I give up on my PCMCIA Ethernet Card. I think I've tried almost
> everything. 3 different Kernels,
> 3 different versions of PCMCIA sources. The card gets recognized but as
> soon as I start to send
> packages to it (e.g. ping an address or just execute route) the w
Jens Helweg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I give up on my PCMCIA Ethernet Card. I think I've tried almost
> everything. 3 different Kernels,
> 3 different versions of PCMCIA sources. The card gets recognized but as
> soon as I start to send
> packages to it (e.g. ping an address or just execute route) the
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:36:15AM -0700, Jens Helweg wrote:
>
> ... recommend a card that works for sure and is not too expensive ?
> I think I am willing
> to buy another networkcard...
>
> Thx.
>
> Jens
>
Mine is D-Link 660CT. Works fine with Linus 2.2.13 and pcmcia 3.0.10.
I recompiled the s
Hi Benjamin,
I use a cheap NoName card as well. It works fine under windows. I had SuSE Linux
before and it was working after trying a lot of things (including building a new
kernel
and new PCMCIA).
The networkcard even came with a driver (pcnet_cs) that seems to be a little
modified compared to t
Hi,
Kernel 2.2.15 and 2.2.16
PCMCIA 3.1.8 and 3.1.14 and 3.1.18
The card is a no name card but it comes with a disk that has the driver
(pcnet_cs)
It seems to be a little modified from the one that comes with the PCMCIA
sources.
Everything gets compiled fine. I have to look up the version of gcc
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jens Helweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I give up on my PCMCIA Ethernet Card. I think I've tried almost
> everything. 3 different Kernels,
[snip]
The lastest pcmcia-sources broke support for my network card as well.
This was with woody and 2.2.17-pre6 (I think
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:36:15AM -0700, Jens Helweg wrote:
>
> ... recommend a card that works for sure and is not too expensive ?
> I think I am willing
> to buy another networkcard...
>
> Thx.
>
> Jens
>
Mine is D-Link 660CT. Works fine with Linus 2.2.13 and pcmcia 3.0.10.
I recompiled the
Hi Benjamin,
I use a cheap NoName card as well. It works fine under windows. I had SuSE Linux
before and it was working after trying a lot of things (including building a new
kernel
and new PCMCIA).
The networkcard even came with a driver (pcnet_cs) that seems to be a little
modified compared to
Hi,
Kernel 2.2.15 and 2.2.16
PCMCIA 3.1.8 and 3.1.14 and 3.1.18
The card is a no name card but it comes with a disk that has the driver
(pcnet_cs)
It seems to be a little modified from the one that comes with the PCMCIA
sources.
Everything gets compiled fine. I have to look up the version of gcc
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jens Helweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I give up on my PCMCIA Ethernet Card. I think I've tried almost
> everything. 3 different Kernels,
[snip]
The lastest pcmcia-sources broke support for my network card as well.
This was with woody and 2.2.17-pre6 (I thin
On Mon, 15 May 2000, karthikeyan gourisankaran wrote:
>
> hi. I just installed debian on my laptop toshiba
> satellite 2595cdt. I have a pcmcis 3ComLan PC
> card(3ccfe574bt lan pc card). I do not know how to
> install it ie what drivers/modules to use(i am a
> newbie;bear with me).Can someone s
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >Only if you have a 10/100 switch that works fine.
>
> Which from my experience means more 100baseT networks.
>
> >On a 10/100 Hub all ports will drop to 10 MBit/s and the network wil
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >Only if you have a 10/100 switch that works fine.
>
> Which from my experience means more 100baseT networks.
>
> >On a 10/100 Hub all ports will drop to 10 MBit/s and the network wil
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> >> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
>> >> noting.
>> >
>> >It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
>> >measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
>> >100baseT
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> >> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
>> >> noting.
>> >
>> >It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
>> >measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
>> >100baseT
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
> >> noting.
> >
> >It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
> >measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
> >100baseT network
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
> >> noting.
> >
> >It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
> >measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
> >100baseT network
>> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
>> noting.
>
>It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
>measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
>100baseT network than a 10baseT network. (And it's capable of talking
>> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
>> noting.
>
>It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
>measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
>100baseT network than a 10baseT network. (And it's capable of talking
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
> noting.
It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
100baseT network than a 10baseT ne
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The issue of Cardbus being required for 100baseT is definately worth
> noting.
It's also not true. I have a 100baseT PCMCIA card. I haven't tried
measuring the actual throughput, but it's definately much faster on a
100baseT network than a 10baseT ne
>I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
>9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
>
>First, is a 10 MBit/s card enough or should I buy a 100 MBit/s card?
>Are these cards much more expensive?
>
>Furthermore, are there any problems with thes
>I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
>9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
>
>First, is a 10 MBit/s card enough or should I buy a 100 MBit/s card?
>Are these cards much more expensive?
>
>Furthermore, are there any problems with thes
Michael Thaler wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
> 9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
>
> First, is a 10 MBit/s card enough or should I buy a 100 MBit/s card?
> Are these cards much more expensive?
>
> F
Michael Thaler wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
> 9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
>
> First, is a 10 MBit/s card enough or should I buy a 100 MBit/s card?
> Are these cards much more expensive?
>
> F
I have a sony vaio PCG-748
i have the 3com 16-Bit PC Card
ita a 10/100 model #3C574-TX
i used it on both a 10 and a 100
base networks.
im running 2.2.13 now
i belive i needed 2.2.12
for the updated card support
Hope this help
Don
On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I wa
I have a sony vaio PCG-748
i have the 3com 16-Bit PC Card
ita a 10/100 model #3C574-TX
i used it on both a 10 and a 100
base networks.
im running 2.2.13 now
i belive i needed 2.2.12
for the updated card support
Hope this help
Don
On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I wa
> From: Drew Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 11:28:07PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
> > 9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
> >
> > First, is a 10
> From: Drew Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 11:28:07PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
> > 9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
> >
> > First, is a 10
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 11:28:07PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
> 9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
>
> First, is a 10 MBit/s card enough or should I buy a 100 MBit/s card?
> Are
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 11:28:07PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to buy a pcmcia-ethernet-card for my notebook. I have a Sharp
> 9090 and I want to establish a little network with an old Pentium 75.
>
> First, is a 10 MBit/s card enough or should I buy a 100 MBit/s card?
> Are
39 matches
Mail list logo
