martin f [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:26:46 +0100:
> > It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to
> > be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks!
> you know, strange intuition tells me the opposite, but i guess it's
> a non-uniform curve and for low tr
martin f [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:26:46 +0100:
> > It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to
> > be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks!
> you know, strange intuition tells me the opposite, but i guess it's
> a non-uniform curve and for low t
also sprach Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.30.1807 +0100]:
> It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to
> be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks!
you know, strange intuition tells me the opposite, but i guess it's
a non-uniform curve and f
also sprach Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.30.1807 +0100]:
> It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to
> be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks!
you know, strange intuition tells me the opposite, but i guess it's
a non-uniform curve and
martin f [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 29 Jan 2002 01:16:08 +0100:
> what's your $hash_queue_depth?
>
It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to
be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks!
--
*=-+-__
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]: _ Ugh! Nio2f says
martin f [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 29 Jan 2002 01:16:08 +0100:
> what's your $hash_queue_depth?
>
It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to
be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks!
--
*=-+-__
|lintux-@t-lintux-d0t-cx: _ Ugh! Nio2
also sprach Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1756 +0100]:
> Unfortunately recent (Woody) versions of Postfix have a very large spool-dir
> which seems to makes the program very slow on my low-resource laptop. Do I
> really have to recompile it to get back the good old fast Postf
also sprach Tobias Ulbricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1859 +0100]:
> Is there no program which allows syncing folders?
> I'd like to either imap my mails or use ssh, but in both cases,
> the sent mails are stored in different places!
isync, as previously noted in this thread.
--
martin;
also sprach Tobias Ulbricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1903 +0100]:
> > postfix keeps mail in the spool for five days by default. since i also
> > have a couple of machines on permanent connections, i decided to use
> > TLS-based certificate relay authentication and simply relay my mail
> > th
also sprach Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1756 +0100]:
> Unfortunately recent (Woody) versions of Postfix have a very large spool-dir
> which seems to makes the program very slow on my low-resource laptop. Do I
> really have to recompile it to get back the good old fast Post
also sprach Tobias Ulbricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1859 +0100]:
> Is there no program which allows syncing folders?
> I'd like to either imap my mails or use ssh, but in both cases,
> the sent mails are stored in different places!
isync, as previously noted in this thread.
--
martin;
also sprach Tobias Ulbricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1903 +0100]:
> > postfix keeps mail in the spool for five days by default. since i also
> > have a couple of machines on permanent connections, i decided to use
> > TLS-based certificate relay authentication and simply relay my mail
> > t
mozilla, and most imap clients, allow you to download and read your mails
offline, queue them up to send, etc.
Don't know about mutt, though...
-g
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 06:59:37PM +0100, Tobias Ulbricht wrote:
>
>
> > As for inbound traffic I use IMAP and if theres something which looks goo
Fabian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@28 Jan 2002 17:35:26 +0200:
> Since this is a laptop-list, I'd be interested in hearing what people
> use to read mail on their laptops. Reading mail on a laptop does require
> that one can manage to read mail off-line as well as connected.
>
I have two Pine configurat
On Jan 28, Tobias Ulbricht wrote:
>
> Is there no program which allows syncing folders?
> I'd like to either imap my mails or use ssh, but in both cases,
> the sent mails are stored in different places!
>
> At the moment I do only ssh and write online. Very annoying.
>
there are a few ('rsync' c
> As for inbound traffic I use IMAP and if theres something which looks good (I
> use 'mutt' as my client) I just save it to a local maildir mail box. Its as
> effective as I need, however of course your mileage may vary :)
Is there no program which allows syncing folders?
I'd like to either im
>
> postfix keeps mail in the spool for five days by default. since i also
> have a couple of machines on permanent connections, i decided to use
> TLS-based certificate relay authentication and simply relay my mail
> through a machine in philadelphia whenever and whereever i am.
> a simply queue f
also sprach Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1732 +0100]:
> > i run postfix bound to localhost on my laptop even, and then use
> > fetchmail to obtain all my mail via pop3/ssl. this way, all my mail is
> > always local, and i don't need imap.
> >
> 'nullmailer' I use for outgoing
mozilla, and most imap clients, allow you to download and read your mails offline,
queue them up to send, etc.
Don't know about mutt, though...
-g
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 06:59:37PM +0100, Tobias Ulbricht wrote:
>
>
> > As for inbound traffic I use IMAP and if theres something which looks go
Fabian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@28 Jan 2002 17:35:26 +0200:
> Since this is a laptop-list, I'd be interested in hearing what people
> use to read mail on their laptops. Reading mail on a laptop does require
> that one can manage to read mail off-line as well as connected.
>
I have two Pine configura
On Jan 28, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> i run postfix bound to localhost on my laptop even, and then use
> fetchmail to obtain all my mail via pop3/ssl. this way, all my mail is
> always local, and i don't need imap.
>
'nullmailer' I use for outgoing mail. Its a braindead smtp queue which polls
re
On Jan 28, Tobias Ulbricht wrote:
>
> Is there no program which allows syncing folders?
> I'd like to either imap my mails or use ssh, but in both cases,
> the sent mails are stored in different places!
>
> At the moment I do only ssh and write online. Very annoying.
>
there are a few ('rsync'
> As for inbound traffic I use IMAP and if theres something which looks good (I
> use 'mutt' as my client) I just save it to a local maildir mail box. Its as
> effective as I need, however of course your mileage may vary :)
Is there no program which allows syncing folders?
I'd like to either i
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Since this is a laptop-list, I'd be interested in hearing what people
> use to read mail on their laptops. Reading mail on a laptop does require
> that one can manage to read mail off-line as well as connected.
Well, ssh to my ma
also sprach Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1635 +0100]:
> Since this is a laptop-list, I'd be interested in hearing what people
> use to read mail on their laptops. Reading mail on a laptop does require
> that one can manage to read mail off-line as well as connected.
> If you're
>
> postfix keeps mail in the spool for five days by default. since i also
> have a couple of machines on permanent connections, i decided to use
> TLS-based certificate relay authentication and simply relay my mail
> through a machine in philadelphia whenever and whereever i am.
> a simply queue
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> If you're using IMAP like me, you need to have some sort of caching or
> you'll have to find a network to be able to access your messages. On the
> other hand, a laptop if often not a good place for permanent storage, so
> having
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 17:05, martin f krafft wrote:
> is this relevant to debian-laptop??? as i just stated in another post,
> why can't we just silently ignore viruses and spam, and not send
> upwards of 25 useless off-topic replies for every such message?
> *that's* bandwidth waste!
Oo... What a
also sprach Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1732 +0100]:
> > i run postfix bound to localhost on my laptop even, and then use
> > fetchmail to obtain all my mail via pop3/ssl. this way, all my mail is
> > always local, and i don't need imap.
> >
> 'nullmailer' I use for outgoing
On Jan 28, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> i run postfix bound to localhost on my laptop even, and then use
> fetchmail to obtain all my mail via pop3/ssl. this way, all my mail is
> always local, and i don't need imap.
>
'nullmailer' I use for outgoing mail. Its a braindead smtp queue which polls
r
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Since this is a laptop-list, I'd be interested in hearing what people
> use to read mail on their laptops. Reading mail on a laptop does require
> that one can manage to read mail off-line as well as connected.
Well, ssh to my m
also sprach Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.1635 +0100]:
> Since this is a laptop-list, I'd be interested in hearing what people
> use to read mail on their laptops. Reading mail on a laptop does require
> that one can manage to read mail off-line as well as connected.
> If you're
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> If you're using IMAP like me, you need to have some sort of caching or
> you'll have to find a network to be able to access your messages. On the
> other hand, a laptop if often not a good place for permanent storage, so
> having
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 17:05, martin f krafft wrote:
> is this relevant to debian-laptop??? as i just stated in another post,
> why can't we just silently ignore viruses and spam, and not send
> upwards of 25 useless off-topic replies for every such message?
> *that's* bandwidth waste!
Oo... What
34 matches
Mail list logo
