> another thing you need to mention is whether you are using the kernel
> support for pcmcia or whether you are just using the pcmcia package? I
> would highly recommend the package version of pcmcia rather than the
> kernel version, also use version 3.1.24 (3.1.25 has an interesting feature
> whi
> another thing you need to mention is whether you are using the kernel
> support for pcmcia or whether you are just using the pcmcia package? I
> would highly recommend the package version of pcmcia rather than the
> kernel version, also use version 3.1.24 (3.1.25 has an interesting feature
> wh
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you
> > keep to it?
>
> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.
>
h maybe a good idea to upgrade :)
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you
> > keep to it?
>
> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.
>
h maybe a good idea to upgrade :)
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.
Yeah - ext2 could pretty much be guaranteed to need a fsck after a reboot
on my SMP box under 2.4.2. 2.4.3-ac5 seems Ok though.
--
I am worthless. I struggle with the simple thi
Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
> it?
Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
2.4.2.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The world is coming to an en
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Diarmuid Drew wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
> connection on my home network. Under 2.4.2 everything is rock solid but
> 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 are broken. The common error I get is "transmit timeout".
>
> any su
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.
Yeah - ext2 could pretty much be guaranteed to need a fsck after a reboot
on my SMP box under 2.4.2. 2.4.3-ac5 seems Ok though.
--
I am worthless. I struggle with the simple th
Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
> it?
Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
2.4.2.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The world is coming to an e
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Diarmuid Drew wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
> connection on my home network. Under 2.4.2 everything is rock solid but
> 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 are broken. The common error I get is "transmit timeout".
>
> any s
I wonder if anybody out there can help. I own a Dell Inspiron 3500 running
Debian 2.2r3 with a 2.4 kernel. I use a PCMCIA multifunctional card "Psion
DACOM Gold Card NetGlobal 56k + 10/100mb Cardbus" for modem and Ethernet
network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
conn
I wonder if anybody out there can help. I own a Dell Inspiron 3500 running
Debian 2.2r3 with a 2.4 kernel. I use a PCMCIA multifunctional card "Psion
DACOM Gold Card NetGlobal 56k + 10/100mb Cardbus" for modem and Ethernet
network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
con
12 matches
Mail list logo
