On 19 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> > I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
>> > bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So
>> > I tinkered around a
On Monday 18 November 2002 02:28 am, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear .debs,
>
> I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
> bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
> tinkered around a bit with k
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
> > bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
> > tinkered around a bit with kernel options and tested perfo
Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday, 18. November 2002 13:01, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> > > Question 2: Can I do better than this?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > > I still think hard disk performance is a bit slow but that may be just
> > > m
On 19 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> > I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
>> > bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So
>> > I tinkered around a
On Monday 18 November 2002 02:28 am, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear .debs,
>
> I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
> bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
> tinkered around a bit with k
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
> > bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
> > tinkered around a bit with kernel options and tested perfo
Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday, 18. November 2002 13:01, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> > > Question 2: Can I do better than this?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > > I still think hard disk performance is a bit slow but that may be just
> > > m
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Robert Michel wrote:
> Salve Mike,
>
> no no, I wouldn't buy a golden case for my laptop either,
> I thought about an selfmade and cheap raid,
> Linux-dell-laptop is also discussing how to change CPUs of Laptops,
> to make them faster (and the battery running time shorter).
>
On Monday, 18. November 2002 15:55, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Robert Michel wrote:
> > Just for speed fetishists ;-)
> > No - my hds is fust enough but I would be interested if someone already
> > heared about it and has a report or know a webpage about it .
>
> There's a couple la
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Robert Michel wrote:
> Salve Mike,
>
> no no, I wouldn't buy a golden case for my laptop either,
> I thought about an selfmade and cheap raid,
> Linux-dell-laptop is also discussing how to change CPUs of Laptops,
> to make them faster (and the battery running time shorter).
>
On Monday, 18. November 2002 15:55, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Robert Michel wrote:
> > Just for speed fetishists ;-)
> > No - my hds is fust enough but I would be interested if someone already
> > heared about it and has a report or know a webpage about it .
>
> There's a couple la
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Robert Michel wrote:
> Just for speed fetishists ;-)
> No - my hds is fust enough but I would be interested if someone already heared
> about it and has a report or know a webpage about it .
There's a couple laptops out there with bays for up to four hard drives,
Eurocom.ca s
On Monday, 18. November 2002 13:01, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > Question 2: Can I do better than this?
>
> No.
>
> > I still think hard disk performance is a bit slow but that may be just
> > me.
>
> It is. You have a laptop, which means a 5400RPM drive
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Robert Michel wrote:
> Just for speed fetishists ;-)
> No - my hds is fust enough but I would be interested if someone already heared
> about it and has a report or know a webpage about it .
There's a couple laptops out there with bays for up to four hard drives,
Eurocom.ca s
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
> bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
> tinkered around a bit with kernel options and tested performance with
> hdparm -tT. Now I'd like to know wha
On Monday, 18. November 2002 13:01, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > Question 2: Can I do better than this?
>
> No.
>
> > I still think hard disk performance is a bit slow but that may be just
> > me.
>
> It is. You have a laptop, which means a 5400RPM drive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear .debs,
I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
tinkered around a bit with kernel options and tested performance with
hdparm -tT. Now I'd like to
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
> bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
> tinkered around a bit with kernel options and tested performance with
> hdparm -tT. Now I'd like to know wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear .debs,
I'm a minimalist and rolled my own kernel. It was absolutely bare
bones and that had a noticable effect on hard disk performance. So I
tinkered around a bit with kernel options and tested performance with
hdparm -tT. Now I'd like to
20 matches
Mail list logo
