Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-03 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:11:20PM -0700, Curt Howland wrote: > > There are distros that are designed for people who want to give linux > > a try without repartitioning. I tried one a couple years ago, and it > > had a windoze-based installer that created the image file, and set up > > loadlin wi

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-03 Thread Curt Howland
> There are distros that are designed for people who want to give linux > a try without repartitioning. I tried one a couple years ago, and it > had a windoze-based installer that created the image file, and set up > loadlin with an initrd thing. If you get stuck, just look at how they > do it,

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-03 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:20:16AM +0200, A. Demarteau (linux rules!) wrote: > on my laptop I use a loopback-file for the /usr partitions. > This is however, very slow. > I think you would be better off using the umsdos filesystem (which hapily > co-exsists with windows on the same disk-partition

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-03 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:11:20PM -0700, Curt Howland wrote: > > There are distros that are designed for people who want to give linux > > a try without repartitioning. I tried one a couple years ago, and it > > had a windoze-based installer that created the image file, and set up > > loadlin wit

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-03 Thread Curt Howland
> There are distros that are designed for people who want to give linux > a try without repartitioning. I tried one a couple years ago, and it > had a windoze-based installer that created the image file, and set up > loadlin with an initrd thing. If you get stuck, just look at how they > do it, o

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-02 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:20:16AM +0200, A. Demarteau (linux rules!) wrote: > on my laptop I use a loopback-file for the /usr partitions. > This is however, very slow. > I think you would be better off using the umsdos filesystem (which hapily > co-exsists with windows on the same disk-partition w

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-02 Thread A. Demarteau \(linux rules!\)
on my laptop I use a loopback-file for the /usr partitions. This is however, very slow. I think you would be better off using the umsdos filesystem (which hapily co-exsists with windows on the same disk-partition without troubles). On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Curt Howland wrote: > > Hi. > > I realize

Re: Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-02 Thread A. Demarteau (linux rules!)
on my laptop I use a loopback-file for the /usr partitions. This is however, very slow. I think you would be better off using the umsdos filesystem (which hapily co-exsists with windows on the same disk-partition without troubles). On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Curt Howland wrote: > > Hi. > > I realize

Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-01 Thread Curt Howland
Hi. I realize that the "best" way to install a distribtion of Linux is to wipe the disk and start over, but I'm curious if anyone has tried this. I put a copy of Dragon Linux on my laptop, in a 1-gig loop-back "partition" file so that it cohabitates with windows just fine. However, having actu

Debian into an existing Loopback file system

2001-08-01 Thread Curt Howland
Hi. I realize that the "best" way to install a distribtion of Linux is to wipe the disk and start over, but I'm curious if anyone has tried this. I put a copy of Dragon Linux on my laptop, in a 1-gig loop-back "partition" file so that it cohabitates with windows just fine. However, having act