Hello again,
To get the new ati driver working I installed XFree86 4.2.0 from the binary
distribution from xfree86.org following the mini-HOWTO on mobilix.org. Now I
can run the new ati driver but no modules are being loaded on X startup. The
output of X is therefore pretty short.
So, my questi
Hello again,
To get the new ati driver working I installed XFree86 4.2.0 from the binary
distribution from xfree86.org following the mini-HOWTO on mobilix.org. Now I can run
the new ati driver but no modules are being loaded on X startup. The output of X is
therefore pretty short.
So, my quest
OK, following all your helpful comments I now have a fulling working kernel
2.4.18 + pcmcia-cs built from sources.
And the DRM kernel modules compiled and installed without any problems.
But then, when trying to restart the X server I get the following error:
/usr/bin/startxfce: Starting X serve
OK, following all your helpful comments I now have a fulling working kernel 2.4.18 +
pcmcia-cs built from sources.
And the DRM kernel modules compiled and installed without any problems.
But then, when trying to restart the X server I get the following error:
/usr/bin/startxfce: Starting X serv
try
make-kpkg modules_images
from within /usr/src/linux with the pcmcia source in
/usr/src/modules/pcmcia...
that should build a kernel-modules-xx.deb which you can then install.
also read the documentation of make-kpkg which also makes handling different
kernels a lot easier.
greets Ben
Thanks.
I found the .config for my stock kernel also in the kernel-headers-2.4.18 dir.
OK, now I have a working kernel. But pcmcia-cs is still lacking. Thus, I
installed pcmcia-source. This gives me a tarball pcmcia-cs.tar.gz in /usr/src.
I unpacked it, but when trying to "make all", it complains
try
make-kpkg modules_images
from within /usr/src/linux with the pcmcia source in
/usr/src/modules/pcmcia...
that should build a kernel-modules-xx.deb which you can then install.
also read the documentation of make-kpkg which also makes handling different
kernels a lot easier.
greets Be
Thanks.
I found the .config for my stock kernel also in the kernel-headers-2.4.18 dir.
OK, now I have a working kernel. But pcmcia-cs is still lacking. Thus, I installed
pcmcia-source. This gives me a tarball pcmcia-cs.tar.gz in /usr/src. I unpacked it,
but when trying to "make all", it complain
The .config for the stock kernels are in /boot/config-xx and in that case
you'll need the sources from the stock kernel. that means the
kernel-imgage-2.4.18-bf2.4.deb or something similar, i don't know the exact
name of the package.
but I'm not an expert here and maybe my guess is totally w
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:22:32 +0200, Philipp Haller writes:
>my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from
>somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the new configurati
>on.
they're in /boot/config-something.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl +
Benjamin Fritzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
> get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
I unpacked sources and configured a new kernel. I built several kernels with
varying .config files. The probl
The .config for the stock kernels are in /boot/config-xx and in that case
you'll need the sources from the stock kernel. that means the
kernel-imgage-2.4.18-bf2.4.deb or something similar, i don't know the exact
name of the package.
but I'm not an expert here and maybe my guess is totally
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:22:32 +0200, Philipp Haller writes:
>my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from
>somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the new configurati
>on.
they're in /boot/config-something.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl +
Benjamin Fritzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
> get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
I unpacked sources and configured a new kernel. I built several kernels with varying
.config files. The prob
Hi,
on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other
or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things.
I believe I have the same chip.
lspci says:
ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Cheers.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14
looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
if that doesn't help or you already have the sources check if they are
/usr/src/linux.
if that doesn't help then i don't know.
greets benny
On Sunday 06 Oct
Hello all,
My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so I
went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the last
snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the following error
when trying to compile the DRM kernel modules:
The sc
Hi,
on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other
or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things.
I believe I have the same chip.
lspci says:
ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Cheers.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 1
looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
if that doesn't help or you already have the sources check if they are
/usr/src/linux.
if that doesn't help then i don't know.
greets benny
On Sunday 06 Oc
Hello all,
My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so I went to
http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the last snapshot for
mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the following error when trying to
compile the DRM kernel modules:
The s
Dmitry Astapov wrote:
> Yep, same thing here. On http://dri.sourceforge.net
> there is a bit of information that they seek help
> for porting accel code for those cards from Utah-Glx
> project, and that exact date (or version) when those
> cards will be supported with acceleration is unknown.
If
>> Please, dont take my words for granted. It's just an opinion formed
>> after spending alot of time trying to get DRI running. If you prove me
>> wrong, I'll be most grateful :)
DLC> I can give us reason for hope. :-) I have a Latitude CPxJ650 on
DLC> which the Windows 95 version of FlightG
Dmitry Astapov wrote:
> If you have lines there:
>
> (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI Mach64 LM rev 100, Mem @ 0xfd00/24, 0xfecff000/12, I/O @
>0xe800/8
> [snip]
> (--) ATI(0): ATI 3D Rage Mobility graphics controller detected.
> (--) ATI(0): Chip type 4C4D "LM", version 4, foundry TSMC, class 0, rev
SD> Hi, Has anyone here been able to get DRI to work on the ATI Mobility
SD> M1 chipset? I've tried just about everything, with no luck either.
Take a look at /var/log/XFree86.0.log (maybe, substitute your screen number
instead of 0) and find what X servers thinks of your card. Chances are t
On Friday, 20. July 2001 01:07, Sunny Dubey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone here been able to get DRI to work on the ATI Mobility M1
> chipset? I've tried just about everything, with no luck either.
To get the stuff running you've to:
- install the libosmesa debs
- recompile the kernel modules for yo
Do you have GLX enabled, and for normal users? here's what the
appropriate sections of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 (not necessarily exact,
but the basic idea there..):
Section "Module"
Load "GLcore"
Load "dbe"
Load "dri"
Load "extmod"
Load "glx"
Load "record"
Load "fr
Hi,
Has anyone here been able to get DRI to work on the ATI Mobility M1 chipset?
I've tried just about everything, with no luck either.
I tried compiling the new DRI modules from dri.sourceforge.net, and loading
them all, with no luck there. I made sure that my xconfig file had all the
proper
27 matches
Mail list logo
