On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:25, Chipzz wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2002, James D Strandboge wrote:
>
> > From: James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Bug#170843: status of patch
>
> > But, I do not agree that this is just a workaround. esd by itself will
On 11 Dec 2002, James D Strandboge wrote:
> From: James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Bug#170843: status of patch
> But, I do not agree that this is just a workaround. esd by itself will
> honor ESD_SPAWN_OPTIONS, but gnome-session doesn't because o
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:25, Chipzz wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2002, James D Strandboge wrote:
>
> > From: James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Bug#170843: status of patch
>
> > But, I do not agree that this is just a workaround. esd by itself will
On 11 Dec 2002, James D Strandboge wrote:
> From: James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Bug#170843: status of patch
> But, I do not agree that this is just a workaround. esd by itself will
> honor ESD_SPAWN_OPTIONS, but gnome-session doesn't because o
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 14:46, Christian Marillat wrote:
> James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was just wondering what is the status of this patch? I looked at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170843 and it doesn't
> > look like anything is happening with it.
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 14:46, Christian Marillat wrote:
> James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was just wondering what is the status of this patch? I looked at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170843 and it doesn't
> > look like anything is happening with it.
6 matches
Mail list logo
