Re: APM under 2.4

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: > I had this problem on my notebook, too. It turned out that I set > CONFIG_APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF, but > forgot to set CONFIG_APM=y (it was "m"), so I either had to do "insmod Well I have set CONFIG_APM=m and you are right, that halt works if I

Re: APM under 2.4

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: > I had this problem on my notebook, too. It turned out that I set >CONFIG_APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF, but > forgot to set CONFIG_APM=y (it was "m"), so I either had to do "insmod Well I have set CONFIG_APM=m and you are right, that halt works if I

Re: APM under 2.4

* Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello, > > I have observed changes in the behaviour of APM on my E-Series > Lifebook afgter upgrading to Testing + Kernel 2.4. Formerly the > Notebook did a suspend after closing the Display (or pressing the > little sensor wich detects closing). This

APM under 2.4

Hello, I have observed changes in the behaviour of APM on my E-Series Lifebook afgter upgrading to Testing + Kernel 2.4. Formerly the Notebook did a suspend after closing the Display (or pressing the little sensor wich detects closing). This is not the case anymore. Moreover a halt doesn't swit

Re: APM under 2.4

* Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello, > > I have observed changes in the behaviour of APM on my E-Series > Lifebook afgter upgrading to Testing + Kernel 2.4. Formerly the > Notebook did a suspend after closing the Display (or pressing the > little sensor wich detects closing). Thi

APM under 2.4

Hello, I have observed changes in the behaviour of APM on my E-Series Lifebook afgter upgrading to Testing + Kernel 2.4. Formerly the Notebook did a suspend after closing the Display (or pressing the little sensor wich detects closing). This is not the case anymore. Moreover a halt doesn't swi