On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:06:03 -0400, Derek Broughton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Did firestarter get any documentation yet? I have tried it a few times. It
> looks like it's on the right track, but it had useless documentation. It
> just wasn't worth the effort.
>
If I may offer my $0.02,
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:44:46 +0100, Mauro Darida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 at 14:07:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The biggest benefit is the 2.6 kernel... which means ACPI... I could not
> > get ACPI with the 2.4, you have to patch etc etc
> >
> False. Latest Lin
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:10:56 +0100, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Choose Debian if you want freedom, modularity, APT, and attention to
> technical detail. Choose Libranet or Ubuntu if you want all of the
> above plus easier installation and configuration, minus some freedom.
> Choose
Thanks for all of the responses! So far, Debian folks sure are helpful! =)
I have a few more questions, if that's okay...
1. Woody versus Sarge. Any idea when Sarge will be released? Any
major benefits over Woody?
2. It sounds as if I am going to have to get comfy with compiling the
kernel,
My apologies for x-posting this. I originally posted it to
debian-users and THEN noticed that there was a group specifically for
laptops. It won't happen again.
_
I am looking to move from FC2 to Debian, but have questions...
1. I am still a Linux newbie. Most of the instal
5 matches
Mail list logo
