Re: intel pro wireless 2200: ndiswrapper/ipw2200

2004-09-04 Thread sime
Would You please inform me and / or this list when You get new information according the the WEP-encryption with ndiswrapper? Do You know anything about implementing WPA and / or WPA2 into ndiswrapper? I didn't say anything about ndiswrapper. -sime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

test

2004-09-04 Thread donnie
test, do not reply, thank you.

test

2004-09-04 Thread donnie
test, do not reply, thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: intel pro wireless 2200: ndiswrapper/ipw2200

2004-09-04 Thread Robin Haunschild
Hello, am Samstag, 4. September 2004 11:54 schrieb sime: > > which version? I've tried 0.4 with no success. > > anyway 0.6 was released yesterday. > > I've been running every release. Including 0.6, 0.7 is now out. Got the > same experience unable to enable WEP, but it seems it doesn't load the >

Re: intel pro wireless 2200: ndiswrapper/ipw2200

2004-09-04 Thread sime
which version? I've tried 0.4 with no success. anyway 0.6 was released yesterday. I've been running every release. Including 0.6, 0.7 is now out. Got the same experience unable to enable WEP, but it seems it doesn't load the wep module correclty. Which someone else has posted to the dev list

Re: X resolution on a Gateway M305

2004-09-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 4 Sep 2004, SML wrote: >> in the Xlog there is this line which seems to indicate that X is aware >> that 1024x768 is possible: >> (II) I810(0): Display Info: LFP (local flat panel): attached: TRUE, >> present: TRUE, size: (1024,768 >> (II) I810(0): Size of device LFP (local flat panel) is 1024 x

Re: X resolution on a Gateway M305

2004-09-04 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 04 September 2004 09:23, SML wrote: > > in the Xlog there is this line which seems to indicate that X is aware > > that 1024x768 is possible: > > (II) I810(0): Display Info: LFP (local flat panel): attached: TRUE, > > present: TRUE, size: (

Re: intel pro wireless 2200: ndiswrapper/ipw2200

2004-09-04 Thread Robin Haunschild
Hello, am Samstag, 4. September 2004 11:54 schrieb sime: > > which version? I've tried 0.4 with no success. > > anyway 0.6 was released yesterday. > > I've been running every release. Including 0.6, 0.7 is now out. Got the > same experience unable to enable WEP, but it seems it doesn't load the >

Re: intel pro wireless 2200: ndiswrapper/ipw2200

2004-09-04 Thread sime
which version? I've tried 0.4 with no success. anyway 0.6 was released yesterday. I've been running every release. Including 0.6, 0.7 is now out. Got the same experience unable to enable WEP, but it seems it doesn't load the wep module correclty. Which someone else has posted to the dev list, a

Re: X resolution on a Gateway M305

2004-09-04 Thread SML
> in the Xlog there is this line which seems to indicate that X is aware > that 1024x768 is possible: > (II) I810(0): Display Info: LFP (local flat panel): attached: TRUE, > present: TRUE, size: (1024,768 > (II) I810(0): Size of device LFP (local flat panel) is 1024 x 768 > > So it seems that 1024

Re: X resolution on a Gateway M305

2004-09-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 4 Sep 2004, SML wrote: >> in the Xlog there is this line which seems to indicate that X is aware >> that 1024x768 is possible: >> (II) I810(0): Display Info: LFP (local flat panel): attached: TRUE, >> present: TRUE, size: (1024,768 >> (II) I810(0): Size of device LFP (local flat panel) is 1024 x

Re: X resolution on a Gateway M305

2004-09-04 Thread SML
> in the Xlog there is this line which seems to indicate that X is aware > that 1024x768 is possible: > (II) I810(0): Display Info: LFP (local flat panel): attached: TRUE, > present: TRUE, size: (1024,768 > (II) I810(0): Size of device LFP (local flat panel) is 1024 x 768 > > So it seems that 1024