On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> When building proftpd-dfsg on amd64 I get the following error:
> In file included from /usr/include/asm/types.h:5,
> from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/sigcontext.h:4,
> from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:5,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> We need to add the last few stable update for 2.6.22. Any volunteers?
No. We need license and SC fixes.
Bastian
--
We have found all life forms in the galaxy are capable of superior
development.
-- Kirk, "The G
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:44:54AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> None, at least from my point of view. Just someone have to do it. (See
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on d-kernel.)
The attached patch should apply on the pruned version.
Bastian
--
We have found all life forms in the galaxy
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:44:24AM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> On 2007-10-10, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The attached patch should apply on the pruned version.
> Applies but does not compile:
Yep. Fixed. There are some magic constants in the code ...
Bast
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:21:25PM +0200, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> Are you sure that this is the case? As I wrote, 2.6.15 behaves ok, even
> with window scale active, but 2.6.18 does not.
The parameters changed with 2.6.17.
Bastian
--
Another Armenia, Belgium ... the weak innocents who alwa
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:16:43AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > The attached patch should apply on the pruned version.
> where is the request_firmware() usage?
Nowhere.
Bastian
--
Schshschshchsch.
-- The Gorn, "Arena", stardate 3046.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:19:18AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Yep. Fixed. There are some magic constants in the code ...
Assuming okay.
Bastian
--
Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes.
-- Edith Keeler, "The City on the Edge of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 12:17:09AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> yup the patch is not complete nor upstream quality.
And?
> you remove functionality.
What do you want to say?
Bastian
--
Power is danger.
-- The Centurion, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2
--
To UNSUBS
kernel-package is not maintained by debian-kernel. Ask the maintainer
for support.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 12:29:00PM -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> I am trying to compile a 2.6.19 kernel from pristine source with the
> grsecurity patches applied. I am using gcc 4.2.1 on a Pentium III 1 Ghz
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:08:38AM +, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Log:
> Adding rt2400.
As I already asked. What is the difference to the upstream merged
rt2x00?
Bastian
--
Extreme feminine beauty is always disturbing.
-- Spock, "The Cloud Minders", stardate 5818.4
--
To UNSU
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:22:06PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Please apply the patch in #429064. It has been tagged as having a patch
> since July 18, the patch is trivial (and correct, IMHO)
No, it is not correct. glibc is not the only libc supported by Debian.
Bastian
--
Military secr
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:52:33AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> I've committed this to the etch branch and am running the patch on a
> local sparc system. However, I've never seen this problem myself and
> don't know how to reproduce it.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433187#60
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:01:10PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | dh_pycentral /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.23-1/lib/python
> | bash: dh_pycentral: command not found
>
> Seems like 2.6.23 needs a build-depends on python-central.
| Build-Depends-Indep: bzip2, findutils (>= 4.2.12), python-centra
severity 451230 normal
tags 451230 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Joachim Krais wrote:
> If we reboot the system, the HSI network-interface won't automatically
> come up.
s390 never had automatic setup of devices. Please show your
configuration. The debian installer set
forcemerge 425851 451530
thanks
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:54:56PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> This is a regression, the etch kernel does work in the virtual machine.
No. vmware implemented the emulation wrong. There is an update
available.
Bastian
--
Bones: "The man's DEAD, Jim!"
--
T
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:02:56PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> i'm pondering to revert it's removal for now until a patch
> with request_firmware is written.
NACK. You did not provide anything productive for the last discussions
about this so please stop that.
> upstream should hopefully un
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:52:24AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, maximilian attems wrote:
> > announcing upload of linux-image 2.6.23 to sid on friday
> > it is already on 2.6.23.9.
> > please holler if you have outstanding issues.
> hmm ominous sparc dpkg fix, got a box r
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:44:42PM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> haven't seen /sbin/hotplug (default value) for a long time,
> although had no bad side effects just set UEVENT_HELPER_PATH
> on /sbin/udevd
Well, it is supported and udev knows how to set it on runtime. I doubt
that we should mak
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:16:02AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> I've recently upgraded to a newer kernel, and since then, a number of
> hosts on my local LAN are unable to contact the outside world (using the
> same setup). It appears that some of the netfilter changes between
> 2.6.20 and 2.6.22
reassign 454914 shapetools
forcemerge 454875 454914
thanks
OPEN_MAX got removed from the headers because nothing in the kernel
respects this value any longer as it is a variable limit.
See commit 77293034696e3e0b6c8b8fc1f96be091104b3d2b for further
informations.
Bastian
--
There's coffee in th
tags 455264 wontfix
thanks
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 05:08:39PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> this patch adds/removes the openais user - the default user aisexec
> wants to run as if not started via e.g. cman. Please apply.
There is currently no user of this except cman. Please provide a
rational
tags 455265 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> this patch adds /etc/ais - the directory aisexec looks for its
> config. Please apply.
Why?
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 07:52:04PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Because people want to run aisexec without cman and aisexec wants the
> ais user by default. But please don't bother I keep the patches around
> here locally.
You are the first person requesting this.
Bastian
--
Superior ability
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 01:36:02AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> For what purpose? Does the future openais based heartbeat implementation
> require an aisexec user?
It seems to use an already running copy. We can also use nobody as
default user, it always exists.
Bastian
--
The sight of de
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:53:06PM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> Reenable DABUSB as firmware is BSD licensed.
This is insufficient, the tar still includes the wrong version. Please
revert it.
Bastian
--
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
-- Spock, "Dag
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:35:28PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> ooh yeah crap the patch will not apply. i'll comment it for next -rcX
You need to remove the other changes also.
Bastian
--
It is a human characteristic to love little animals, especially if
they're attractive in some way.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:53:06PM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > Reenable DABUSB as firmware is BSD licensed.
>
> This is insufficient, the tar still includes the wrong version. Please
> revert it.
I di
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:41:34PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> the other change is only needed for generating .orig tarballs
> and any newly generated should have dabusb from now on.
You ignore the project decision again. It can be changed after it is
fixed upstream. Stop that.
Bastian
--
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:07:29PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> big NACK,
> are you nuts!?
You forgot to reply to my concerns in the first one.
> this is a bsd firmware.
No. Upstream still lists it as gpl.
Bastian
--
It is undignified for a woman to play servant to a man who is not hers.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:03:01AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Why there are no transition packages (to the -i686 flavour)? How shall
> users know, that they will never get any update of their -k7 package? Is
> it possible to make at least linux-image-2.6-k7 (and similar packages)
> depend on th
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is insufficient, the tar still includes the wrong version. Please
> revert it.
Th change readded a file, which at least in this form is seen as
undistributable. It would be possible to directly change it in the orig
tarb
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:31:43PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> waldi let's speech tacheless you are full of shit.
> stop with that stupid circle logic.
Unless you are able to provide something substantively to this
discussion, I declare EOD.
> if one gets the written consent of the copyrigh
Hi folks
2.6.23 still does not build on hppa. One possible seems gcc 4.2, but
someone needs to check it.
Bastian
--
Respect is a rational process
-- McCoy, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:54:14PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I just made some changes to arm/iop32x in 2.6.23 SVN that apparently
> changed the ABI, but after I reverted my changes I still see ABI changes.
> I guess this was caused by a stable update. Are we going to back these
> changes ou
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:54:14PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I just made some changes to arm/iop32x in 2.6.23 SVN that apparently
> > changed the ABI, but after I reverted my changes I still see ABI changes.
&
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Bastian Blank a écrit :
> > 2.6.23 still does not build on hppa. One possible seems gcc 4.2, but
> > someone needs to check it.
> The problems also occurs with gcc-4.2.
Okay, so I
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:06:52PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > It is caused by 2.6.23.10. Reason still unknown.
> The best candidate is 89bdb3683f1fcc65e3ac150995f3c11c5e6e9ba6, it
> changes "struct restart_block", which is part of "struct k_clock",
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:06:59PM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> Log:
> [hppa] No need to hardcode gcc-4.1
> change proposed by kyle and build verified on paer
And how do you check the correctness of build-dependencies on this
machine which usualy have all compilers installed?
The hppa64 vers
tags 456735 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Stefan Ritter wrote:
> the network controller in the Dell Inspiron 530 does not work with the
> e1000 module. But there are some sources for e1000_ich9 on sf.
More informations? lspci output?
Bastian
--
You're dead, Jim.
reopen 415095
thanks
not fixed
Bastian
--
Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!
-- Harry Mudd, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:11:56PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> announcing upload for friday of linux-2.6 trunk, remaining issues
> - abi bump, yes no??
no.
Basian
--
Either one of us, by himself, is expendable. Both of us are not.
-- Kirk, "The Devil in the Dark", stardat
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:06:09PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Okay with me. I just reverted two of my config changes that change
> the ABI.
Can you please explain why noone read my answer to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
Bastian
--
Pain is a thing of the mind. The mind can be controlled.
tags 457601 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:51:30PM +0100, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I think your linux-modules-contrib package generates bad version
> number for rt73-modules.
> The version number for module package should be the version of
> rt73-source package, i.e.
> 1:1.0.3.6-cvs20
tags 457631 moreinfo
severity 457631 normal
thanks
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:01:53AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> At about 00:25, the system completely froze: the mouse and the keyboard
> were no longer working (even Ctrl-Alt-Del), and the network connection
> was no longer working either. Not
tags 457603 moreinfo
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:58:49PM +0100, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Please, add the r6040 package to your linux-modules-extra-2.6 package.
Upstream status?
Bastian
--
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
-- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind",
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:44:02PM +, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> adjust path for {build,source,modules.*} for m68k only
This is a workaround for some generic problem. The kernel thinks it have
a different EXTRAVERSION than the package. Please revert and fix the
real problem.
Bastian
--
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:40:56AM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
> When compiling for Athlon using gcc-4.3:
>
> gcc-4.3 --version
> gcc-4.3 (Debian 4.3-20080104-1) 4.3.0 20080104 (experimental) [trunk
> revision 131316]
Does Linux upstream already bless gcc 4.3? I doubt.
> kernel/built-in.o: In fu
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:58:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I'm interested in getting d-i to work seamlessly inside a Xen guest
> domain using the paravirt_ops kernel support for Xen in 2.6.24+
> (currently only available in the kernel svn trunk snapshots builds I
> think).
2.6.23 already have
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:35:51PM -0200, Paulo Diovani wrote:
> my kernel does not create /dev/sda1 (root) on boot. grub loads from
> the same hd and, sometimes, the system works fine, but in most of'em i
> fall into busybox and have only /dev/hda (cdrom).
What is the content of /sys/block at thi
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:08:55PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> I plan to upload the first linux-2.6.23 for etchnahalf this coming
> Sunday. The changes I have in mind before then are:
> * Merge in 2.6.23.13 (one changeset)
> * Revert to the older Firewire stack (for compatability w/ etch)
Chang
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:01:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised since I haven't seen any discussion about this on
> debian-kernel recently.
Several members of d-k opposed that version..
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopp
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:56:24PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> How far is -final away?
Usualy short time. So two NEW rounds are out of possibilities.
Bastian
--
... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get
to know each other.
-- Kirk, "Elaan of
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 05:30:20PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The explicit Xen images will disappear in the future, it just lacks
> > infrastructure.
> By infrastructure do you mean meta-packages to facilitate upgrade or
> something else?
Infrastructure as in maintainer scripts.
Bastian
--
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:56:29PM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> Ever since etch was upgraded to linux-image-2.6.18-5, my system has been
> unable to boot. It kernel panics on boot, but not during the mount of
> the root file system. I'm unable to work out what exactly in the boot
> process is the pr
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:10:15AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> RIP free_pages_bulk
[...]
> RIP: kmem_cache_free
[...]
> RIP: refresh_cpu_vm_stats
> general protection fault: [2] SMP
> CPU 1
This looks like broken memory or other component.
Bastian
--
Actual war is a very messy business. Ver
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:37:36AM +0100, Olaf Till wrote:
> Description of bug: forcedeth module seems is inserted without error
> messages, but eth0 still seems not to be present
The kernel don't garantue that the name is eth0. You have to check for
_any_ name.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and f
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule the first upload of 2.6.24-rc8 into experimental
for friday.
Bastian
--
The heart is not a logical organ.
-- Dr. Janet Wallace, "The Deadly Years", stardate 3479.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:13:26AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Of course, I could go back and hack the vserver patch, or add a
> "fixup" patch into 9-extra that reverts the security fix before it
> applies the unmodified vserver patch, then reapply the security fix to
> vserver in 17-extra. But, b
Hi folks
I intend to branch 2.6.24 tomorrow after a full snapshots run. I intent
to upload them after that. It still have no vserver support, but this
will be ignored.
Bastian
--
We fight only when there is no other choice. We prefer the ways of
peaceful contact.
-- Kirk, "Spec
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:55:02PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> * Package name: eeepc-acpi-source
> Version : 1.0-1
> Upstream Author : Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ecc/eeepc-acpi_1.0.tar.gz
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lan
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 03:16:59PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> the final 2.6.24 upload has ACPI_SYSFS_POWER activated instead of
> ACPI_PROCFS_POWER, causing all applets using hal (#462723), and those
> parsing proc directly (/usr/bin/acpi, wmacpi...) to fail reading the
> battery status.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> these are defined in libgcc.a (linking with -static-libgcc should
> resolve these symbols).
No. libgcc is not compatible with the kernel ABI.
Bastian
--
The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
-
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> That's openafs, which is open source but just lacking MODULE_LICENSE
> what's tainting the kernel. Irrelevant IMHO.
But behaves like a rootkit, or did they kill the syscall table
modifications?
Bastian
--
Landru! Guide us!
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:47:12AM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080129 23:47]:
> > But behaves like a rootkit, or did they kill the syscall table
> > modifications?
> Nope, you're right - sys_call_table seems to be still
> ar
Hi folks
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.24-2 tomorrow.
Bastian
--
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
-- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:05:07PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:37:33PM -0500, Graham wrote:
> > This image is failing to boot on my Virtual PC 2007. I will attach a
> > screen capture, and also a best-effort transcription.
> >
> >
&g
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:37:33PM -0500, Graham wrote:
> This image is failing to boot on my Virtual PC 2007. I will attach a
> screen capture, and also a best-effort transcription.
>
>
> Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel.
>
> BUG: Int 6: CR2
> EDI ESI 00
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:46:16AM +, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> Author: gordon-guest
> Date: Sat Feb 2 09:46:12 2008
> New Revision: 10372
>
> Modified:
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches/features/arm/ixp4xx-net-drivers.patch
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches/features/arm/ixp4xx-
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.24-3 for tomorrow.
Bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> If
> we have a lot of spare CPU cycles, we can do that, until then I prefer to
> cross-compile. But you are right, the kernel should be buildable on an m
Hi folks
I already expressed my denial of the current handling of the trunk. maks
decided to push git patchsets into it. This have some serious problems
and even violates some of our rules.
- It seriously increases the repository size. I found 10 revisions with
20MiB each, which is 30% of the to
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:49:20AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 14:08]:
> > I'd like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.24-3 for tomorrow.
> BTW, are the m68k folks aware that 2.6.24 doesn't build on m68k?
cts
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:14:08PM +, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Log:
> Enabling atl2 on all archs.
I doubt that this will work.
[...]
> desc: Driver for the Atheros(R) L2 Fast Ethernet Adapter
PCI? USB?
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:22:20PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> * Enable CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI for base platform support
> * Enable CONFIG_PASEMI_MAC=m for ethernet drivers
Okay.
> * Enable CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA=y, since we tend to use those cards in some eval
> systems and it's convenient
Open firmwa
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:28:08AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> HOSTCC drivers/atm/fore200e_mkfirm
> drivers/atm/fore200e_mkfirm -k -b _fore200e_pca_fw \
> -i "" -o drivers/atm/fore200e_pca_fw.c
> drivers/atm/fore200e_mkfirm: can't open for reading
This file is removed from
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:36:18AM -0500, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> Here is a working stanza with the pre-up line:
> iface wlan0 inet dhcp
> pre-up ifconfig wlan0 up
> wireless_essid MakeTeaNotWar
This is bogus. The dhcp typ already sets the interface up.
Bastian
--
Star Trek Lives!
--
To
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:35:52AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> Debian is known for outdated kernels.
> 2.6.8 got out with Sarge release. By then this kernel
> was about a year old and wouldn't install on SATA boxes.
> 2.6.18 is the Etch kernel, it was half a year old when
> we rel
Hi folks
This is the first version of the bnx2 request_firmware patch. It works
with the 4.0.5 firmware from the bnx2 version in 2.6.25.
I also attached the firmware extractor.
Known problems:
- MODULE_FIRMWARE spec missing.
- Firmware is loaded in netdevice open method.
Bastian
--
Genius doe
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:30:01AM +, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Added patch from unionfs upstream to export release_open_intent symbol.
And Linux upstream said what about this? It changes the ABI of vmlinux,
so nack.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, "Mirro
tags 464945 patch
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:19:20AM +0300, Okulov Vitaliy wrote:
> Just try explot from http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/5092 at my
> linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 kernel. And it works. Please backport patch
> from 2.6.24.1 kernel (CVE-2008-0009/10).
Preliminary patch, it includes more
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:00:33PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:19:20AM +0300, Okulov Vitaliy wrote:
> > Just try explot from http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/5092 at my
> > linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 kernel. And it works. Please backport patch
> >
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:43:23PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:00:33PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:19:20AM +0300, Okulov Vitaliy wrote:
> > > Just try explot from http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/5092 at my
> > &g
tags 465234 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:52:33AM +0100, Jordi Pujol wrote:
> a kernel with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED enabled does not permit to use the
> renaming interfaces features with udev
Please show evidence. I use this kernel and udev renames the wlan device
all
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.24-4 within the next
three hours.
Bastian
--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!
-- Bailey, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.2
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:42:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Okay, the faulting instruction is the following:
> c0383360: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%eax)
include/asm-x86/nops.h:
| /* P6 nops */
| /* uses eax dependencies (Intel-recommended choice) */
[...]
| #define P6_NOP4 ".b
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:42:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The Crusoe code morphing software apparently doesn't recognize these
> "long noops", and (presumably) the rest of the hinting NOOP group. gcc
> didn't use to generate them, and Crusoe/Efficeon generally do not
> benefit from code
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:01:58PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> For the record, the above hunk is unnecessary because the get_user()
> calls which immediately follow the quoted code perform implict
> access_ok() checks. CVE-2008-0010 does NOT apply to our 2.6.18 kernel
> (but the additional acce
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:43:46PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> thanks for reminder, nuked that useless warning for 2.6.25-1
> very harmless.
It is a left over from make-kpkg usage.
Bastian
--
All your people must learn before you can reach for the stars.
-- Kirk, "The Game
severity 464197 wishlist
tags 464197 help
thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:33:05PM -0600, Jan Hetges wrote:
> could please someone reenable snd-cs46xx ?
No. Not until you provided a patch which seperates the firmware.
Bastian
--
Prepare for tomorrow -- get ready.
-- Edith Keel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:10:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is the first version of the bnx2 request_firmware patch. It works
> with the 4.0.5 firmware from the bnx2 version in 2.6.25.
Second version, it fixes the problems and changes the firmware names a
little bit.
I also at
Hi folks
I intend to do the following changes to the linux-2.6 core before
2.6.25.
Generic:
- Deprecate kernel-package method. It is still used for alpha, arm,
armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, sparc. It will be removed after the
2.6.25 release to make it possible to use features like out-of-t
Hi folks
The kernel team made it possible for a long time to build the udebs from
the binary linux images. This was done be providing the possibility to
go back to every released revision with the linux-patch-debian package.
Because this needs a lot of time to get it correctly I intend to drop
thi
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> While I'm not nacking it right now, I nack it to happen before Beta2
> with 2.6.24 gets out.
I did not setup a timeline yet. Because of the status of .24, it won't
get the support anyway. So .25 is the minimum.
> - Is impossible
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:13:02PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
> >> without
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:40:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> If a unwanted kernel is uploaded to sid and we wanted to update the
> udebs, for a release or something, we would end up doing it
> t-p-u. This would be done with minor testing and possible breaking
> lenny installer.
So? If we nee
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:26:35PM +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> wlan0: Initial auth_alg=0
> wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:0f:66:d9:ec:a5
> wlan0: RX authentication from 00:0f:66:d9:ec:a5 (alg=0 transaction=2
> status=0)
> wlan0: authenticated
>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 06:42:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> For me, to think more about it, we need an agreement from kernel team
> that d-i can veto uploads of kernel. Obviously d-i team won't deny any
> upload with real reasons however this agreement this is a must from my
> POV.
Not acce
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:05:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Before I replay to the proposal and the various options, I have two
> questions:
> 1) Exactly what problem or problems is this proposal solving?
This was no proposal, this was an announcement. We don't longer use this
sort of source sin
Hi folks
I need some input on the following feature: split modules package. Aka
linux-2.6 should build *-image-*-powerpc and *-image-*-powerpc-miboot.
Both depends on *-modules-*-powerpc. They share the same ABI and are
only linked different.
To do this properly, the functionality of the current
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> They are actually needed until there is real support for versatile to
> d-i. This way it is possible to use the initrd.gz from another platform
> instead.
The kernel is built with initramfs support. Do you want to say that it
does n
901 - 1000 of 1950 matches
Mail list logo
