Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs

2025-01-27 Thread Xan Charbonnet
The MariaDB developers are wondering whether another corruption bug, MDEV-35334 ( https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-35334 ) might be related. The symptom was described as: the first 1 byte of a .ibd file is changed from 0 to 1, or the first 4 bytes are changed from 0 0 0 0 to 1 0 0 0. Is i

Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs

2025-01-27 Thread Pavel Begunkov
On 1/26/25 22:48, Xan Charbonnet wrote: Since applying the final patch on Friday, I have seen no problems with either the backup snapshot or catching up with replication.  It sure seems like things are all fixed.  I haven't yet tried it on our production Galera cluster, but I expect to on Mond

Bug#1093435: linux-image-6.12.9-amd64: Unable to boot on linux-image-6.12.9-amd64

2025-01-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
HI, On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:19:45AM -0800, Mark Mandel wrote: > Installed the manual proprietary Nvidia drivers and the crash is > back 🤷🏻‍♂️ > > I think this is the end of me debugging this. So I interpret the results as having identified the problem might just be in src:nvidia-graphics-driv

Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs

2025-01-27 Thread Pavel Begunkov
On 1/27/25 16:38, Xan Charbonnet wrote: The MariaDB developers are wondering whether another corruption bug, MDEV-35334 ( https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-35334 ) might be related. The symptom was described as: the first 1 byte of a .ibd file is changed from 0 to 1, or the first 4 bytes ar

Bug#1093435: linux-image-6.12.9-amd64: Unable to boot on linux-image-6.12.9-amd64

2025-01-27 Thread Mark Mandel
I'll be honest, I'm not entirely sure. I am now trying again on a different Alienware laptop to see if the issue resurfaces. On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 09:52, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > HI, > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:19:45AM -0800, Mark Mandel wrote: > > Installed the manual proprietary Nvidi

Re: Bug#1065416: Bastian's offer in #1065416

2025-01-27 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi 1065416 (2024.11.28_17:03:25_-0400) Two months later: > #1081826: linux-libc-dev ships header files not needed for 99% of it's users That bug is now closed and archived. > #1084908: arch:all linux-libc-dev causes problems to architecture bootstrap This feels close. There are a couple of pr

Bug#1084908: arch:all linux-libc-dev causes problems to architecture bootstrap

2025-01-27 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Bastian: > > Something like this? > > > > | Provides: > > | linux-libc-dev-supports (= amd64-0), > > | linux-libc-dev-supports (= arm64-0), > > | linux-libc-dev-supports-multiarch (= aarch64-linux-gnu-0), > > | linux-libc-dev-supports-multiarch (= x86-64-linux-gnu-0), > > Using Provid