Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd64
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5
(This bug *might* be a duplicate of #446744)
Ever since etch was upgraded to linux-image-2.6.18-5, my system has been
unable to boot. It kernel panics on boot, but not during the mount of
the root file system. I'm unable to work
Here is a partial record of the crash on 2.6.18-5-amd64 with
all-generic-ide and irqpoll removed from the command line:
Stack has:
vgacon_cursor
__down_read
__down_read
blocking_notifier_call_chain
do_exit
do_unblank_screen
kernel_math_error
do_invalid_op
__pagevec_lru_add_active
vsnprintf
error_e
Here is a partial record of the panic on 2.6.18-5-vserver-amd64 with the
all-generic-ide and irqpoll command line parameters removed:
Partial stack (what i can see of it):
unmap_region
do_munmap
__down_write_nested
sys_munmap
system_call
Code: 7e f9 e9 d3 fe ff ff f3 90 83 3b
console shuts ip ..
Here is a partial panic transcript from linux-image-2.6.22-3-amd64
(2.6.22-6~bpo40+1) from backports:
Stack:
free_hot_cold_page
__pagevec_free
release_pages
free_pages_and_swap_cache
exit_mmap
mmput
do_exit
sys_exit_group
system_call
Code: 48 89 46 08 48 89 75 28 48 89 78 08 48 89 41 50 4a ff 84
Here are the kernels on my system which do not boot:
linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5
linux-image-2.6.18-5-vserver-amd64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5
linux-image-2.6.22-3-amd64 2.6.22-6~bpo40+1
linux-image-2.6.22-3-vserver-amd64 2.6.22-6~bpo40+1
Here are the kernels which do boot:
linux-
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:07:29PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> big NACK,
> are you nuts!?
You forgot to reply to my concerns in the first one.
> this is a bsd firmware.
No. Upstream still lists it as gpl.
Bastian
--
It is undignified for a woman to play servant to a man who is not hers.
reassign 456219 linux-2.6
kthxbye
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:58 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> According to [0], the graphics driver uses an interrupt for OpenGL
> compatibility. On my machine, that results in approximately 70 wakeups
> per second when idle, if I use compiz.
>
> Please fix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 456219 linux-2.6
Bug#456219: xserver-xorg-video-intel: causes excessive interrupts with compiz
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-intel' to `linux-2.6'.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:03:01AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Why there are no transition packages (to the -i686 flavour)? How shall
> users know, that they will never get any update of their -k7 package? Is
> it possible to make at least linux-image-2.6-k7 (and similar packages)
> depend on th
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is insufficient, the tar still includes the wrong version. Please
> revert it.
Th change readded a file, which at least in this form is seen as
undistributable. It would be possible to directly change it in the orig
tarball. I w
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:09:38PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > This is insufficient, the tar still includes the wrong version. Please
> > revert it.
>
> Th change readded a file, which at least in this form is seen as
> undistrib
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:31:43PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> waldi let's speech tacheless you are full of shit.
> stop with that stupid circle logic.
Unless you are able to provide something substantively to this
discussion, I declare EOD.
> if one gets the written consent of the copyrigh
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:50:49AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:07:29PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > big NACK,
> > are you nuts!?
>
> You forgot to reply to my concerns in the first one.
which concerns, you didn't phrase them?
i replied immediately to your mails
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:24:07 +0100, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm did you run memtest on your box?
Yes, the memory is fine. But see below...
> > So 2.6.23 seems to work better than 2.6.22-3, but it still produces this
> > strange error that I did not experience before with 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:56AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:17:28PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> >
>> > As noted by Guus Sliepen, switching fr
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> The tarball needs to include the correct licensed version. Also it needs
> to check that no copyrightable change from upstream goes in which
> themself will be GPL.
it does not matter if the tarball contains the copyright license
Maximilian et al:
I see that several things have happend regarding this bug, most notably
that busybox has moved from 'Depends' to 'Recommends' (and that the bug
itself has moved from 'critical' to 'wishlist'). I am not sure of all
of the consequences of this, although it appears from the changel
Your message dated Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:46:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not Found in linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 455456 normal
Bug#455456: wireless-tools: iwconfig Fails to Print SSID
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> reassign 455456 linux-2.6
Bug#455456: wireless-tools: iwconfig Fails to Print SSID
Bug reassigned from package `wireless-tools'
> the stability != preempt seems no longer true as the preempt
> path gets more testing out there.
I'm running my notebook with full preemption since years now, without
any problems. I had to use the -ck patches, though, as the normal
preemption did not work well enough for me. I didn't check ho
20 matches
Mail list logo
