Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: important
Since upgrading to 2.6.17-9, running on an ibook G4 with the Broadcomm
4318 wireless there are issues with the kernel supplied bcm43xx module.
Reverting to 2.6.17-8 (from testing) and the bcm43xx module operates
as expec
Доброго времени суток debian-kernel,
unsubscribe
--
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Gennadiy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 365475 linux-2.6
reassign 328595 linux-2.6
reassign 336244 linux-2.6
reassign 113036 linux-2.6
thanks
I am reassigning these 4 bugs, as they are really kernel IDE layer bugs.
If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to contact me.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 365475 linux-2.6
Bug#365475: hdparm: disk sent to sleep with -Y does not wake up again
Bug reassigned from package `hdparm' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 328595 linux-2.6
Bug#328595: IDE error when running 'hdparm -I /dev/cdrom'
Bug reassigned fr
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge4
My Windows XP partition contains, among other things, the following
file, as seen under Linux:
-r-xr-x--- 2 root dos 512K Jun 16 2005 /tsais/System Volume
Information/_restore{8B199B4A-7BC9-4D0D-A34A-84F47D527625}/RP2/snapshot/_REGISTRY_
Package: linux-image (probably)
Version: 2.6.16-2-parisc_2.6.16-18_hppa
pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-parisc_2.6.16-18_hppa.deb
I tried installing Debian Etch using:
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-hppa/current/images/netboot/2.6/boot.img
When the install
Package: installer-hppa
Version: 11.08.2006
After installing Etch using:
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-hppa/20060806/images/netboot/2.6
on a HP9000 712/60 I ended up with an unbootable system.
Apparently the installer forgot to include the scsi driver into the
initrd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387882 linux-2.6
Bug#387882: module xfs relocation of symbol kmem_zone_zalloc is out of range
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Warning: Unknown package 'probably'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image (probably)' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387909 initramfs-tools
Bug#387909: no lasi700 drivers loaded in initrd
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `initramfs-tools'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387909 initramfs-tools
Bug#387909: no lasi700 drivers loaded in initrd
Warning: Unknown package 'installer-hppa'
Bug reassigned from package `installer-hppa' to `initramfs-tools'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Hello,
I sent this to debian-devel but judging by the archive pages it did
not get through. debian-kernel may be a better choice of destination
anyway.
ttfn/rjk
From: Richard Kettlewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> The kernel somehow loses the information where the initrd image is
> placed in memory. The correct data is there in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:prom_check_initrd(), but in
> init/initramfs.c:populate_rootfs() it's wrong, i
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:17:40PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> > The kernel somehow loses the information where the initrd image is
> > placed in memory. The correct data is there in
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:p
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 08:50:53PM +0200, Victor Seva wrote:
> Sven is right. The packaged version has the "umcompressor thingy"
> and it's the latest version from upstream [0]. But it's older than
> the kernel. I'm going to mail upstream asking for a official 10.0.12
> tarball.
Okay.
Bastian
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386656 + pending
Bug#386656: Please provide vserver flavour(s) for sparc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 04:26:26PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Added: dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/arch/sparc/vserver/defines
> ==
> --- (empty file)
> +++ dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/arch/sparc/vserver/defines Sun Sep 17
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:37:50PM +, Sven Luther wrote:
> Added tentative patch to fix oldworld ramdisk size bug.
> Thanks fo to Christian Aichinger for investigating and providing the patch.
> (Closes: #366620, #375035).
Is this patch submitted?
Bastian
--
"Life and death are seld
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:37:50PM +, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Added tentative patch to fix oldworld ramdisk size bug.
> > Thanks fo to Christian Aichinger for investigating and providing the patch.
> > (Closes: #366620, #375035).
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 375035 + pending
Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running
initramfs init
Tags were: pending
Bug#366620: initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs,
2.6.15-1-powerpc works
Tags added: pending
>
End of m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 359025 + pending
Bug#359025: linux-2.6: [powerpc] PReP is broken in 2.6.16, needs a ARCH=ppc
flavour.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 366620 + pending
Bug#366620: initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs,
2.6.15-1-powerpc works
There were no tags set.
Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running
initramfs init
Tags added: pending
>
End
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.78
Current version: 0.79
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:12:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Probably closed in all etch/sid kernels.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:06:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.6.1[678] support builtin pmac-zilog driver.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:34:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please confirm this is no more an issue in latest 2.6 kernels.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:26:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in 2.6.1[678] ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:44:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line There is no nubus flavour in etch/sid anymore, thus closing
this bug report.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:21:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by Bastian Blank.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:24:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364637 + pending
Bug#364637: [powerpc64] boot hangs at 'Trying to im_free nonexistent area
(d800820d7000)
There were no tags set.
Bug#365730: [powerpc] [d-i] Oops when booting from usb flash drive
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stoppin
FYI: The status of the firmware-nonfree source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more inf
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:50:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No more an issue, ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:11:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No moreinfo since january, thus closing as promised.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:24:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing, since this is fixed since 2.6.15. ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:58:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in both 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc7, didn't test 2.6.16, but
as 2.6.17 is entering etch ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:12:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This has been fixed since 2.6.15, closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:59:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 2.6.17, so closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:14:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in latest 2.6 kernels ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387178 + pending
Bug#387178: [powerpc] Suspend-to-disk does not work with 2.6.17-2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:08:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing, since no moreinfo since january ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Sven Luther wrote:
>
> can you test the 2.6.18-rc7 kernel from :
>
> deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel {sid,trunk} main
>
> Which i believe will close this bug report, thanks to a patch from Mark
> Hymers.
It starts to boot, which is a huge step forward, but then it it
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:48:33AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > can you test the 2.6.18-rc7 kernel from :
> >
> > deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel {sid,trunk} main
> >
> > Which i believe will close this bug report, thanks to a patch from Mar
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:10:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.6.16 and up now are ARCH=powerpc ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7
Version: 2.6.16-18
Severity: normal
When I upgraded from 2.6.15 to the 2.6.16 in testing, I got this error
message about my DVB-T card (some time ago the quasi standard card in
Germany (and for this reason somewhat longer recommended for its linux
support), the Te
Do you like:Need generic rolexes? whackhumeanbilly.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 387997 linux-2.6
Bug#387997: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7: original Hauppauge WinTV-NOVA-T DVB card
deliberately unsupported
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7'
46 matches
Mail list logo
