Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.16-14
I have an LG DVDRAM drive model
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B
it does not work under 2.6.16 using ide-cd.
ide-scsi did support it but is no longer provided as a module in the stock
debian package
I know this may have to go to kernel.org but
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
Hello,
when upgrading from
linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
to any of
- linux-image-2.6.14-2-686_2.6.14-7_i386.deb
- linux-image-2.6.15-1-686_2.6.15-8_i386.deb
- linux-image-2.6.16-2-686_2.6.16-14_i386.deb
- vanilla 2.6.15
wake on lan (wol) doesn'
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> I would suggest keeping the name amd64-generic. It is easier for users
> to see that -generic fits all than -k8.
It's also easier to reintroduce split packages if necessary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
* Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-07 22:39]:
> 1. Alter the NEW handling for kernel (and out of tree modules) packages:
>
> - Add some kind of auto-hinting (if this is technically possible) to
> automatically process kernel packages and co.
>
> - Grant ftp-assistant rights to som
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-07 22:39]:
> > 1. Alter the NEW handling for kernel (and out of tree modules) packages:
> >
> > - Add some kind of auto-hinting (if this is technically possible) to
> > automatica
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 18:25]:
> The issue are ABI changes, but also introduction of new flavours.
Yeah, just like any package... I don't see why we should get special
treatment.
> Also, you have to consider the out-of-tree modules, which may swap
> ABI in dispersed order,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I think the situation with kernels in unstable is fine since an ABI
> change doesn't happen too often anyway.
If we didn't fixed two of them, we currently had -4.
> What I'd like to see is
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:29:21PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 18:25]:
> > The issue are ABI changes, but also introduction of new flavours.
> Yeah, just like any package... I don't see why we should get special
> treatment.
New flavours, yes.
>
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One way to mitigate the problem is to propagate a fixed
> update-grub script into a Sarge point release; here is a minimal
> patch that should make a sarge update-grub script be STDOUT safe.
If the RM people accept I can prepare a package w
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-10sarge3_alpha.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-10sarge3.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-10sarge3.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3_2.4.27-10sarge3_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3-smp_2.4.
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-10sarge3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-10sarge3.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-10sarge3.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3_2.4.27-10sarge3_i386.deb
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-3-686-sm
kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64_2.4.27-10sarge3_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64_2.4.27-10sarge3.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64_2.4.27-10sarge3.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3_2.4.27-10sarge3_ia64.deb
kernel-image-2.4-itanium-smp_2.4.27-1
kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc_2.4.27-9sarge3_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc_2.4.27-9sarge3.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc_2.4.27-9sarge3.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3_2.4.27-9sarge3_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3-sparc64-smp_
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3_powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3.dsc
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3.tar.gz
kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-10sarge3_powerpc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3.dsc
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3_all.deb
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge3_all.deb
ke
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:29:21PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 18:25]:
> > The issue are ABI changes, but also introduction of new flavours.
>
> Yeah, just like any package... I don't see why we should get special
> treatment.
Because abi breakag
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:29:21PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 18:25]:
>> > The issue are ABI changes, but also introduction of new flavours.
>>
>> Yeah, just like any package... I don't see why we shoul
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> 4) To send a mail to the US gov. due to crypto export regulations.
Only sources.
> An abi change in the kernel is exactly the same as an abi change in
> say mozilla. When the abi changes all modules/plugins have to be
> recom
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> rc kernels are uploaded to experimental without the -rcX bit in the
>> name, so the kernel can immediately enter unstable when the final
>> version is out.
>
> Not possible. Only some o
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:47:58PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Not possible. Only some of the arches are autobuilt for experimental.
> Is that so important? Maybe you should lobby for more experimental
> buildds then?
We already tend to overlo
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>> I would suggest keeping the name amd64-generic. It is easier for users
>> to see that -generic fits all than -k8.
>
> It's also easier to reintroduce split packages if necessary.
And should not need changes in base-installe
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> An abi change in the kernel is exactly the same as an abi change in
>> say mozilla. When the abi changes all modules/plugins have to be
>> recompiled. Same thing.
>
> Incorrect. The
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I would suggest keeping the name amd64-generic. It is easier for users
> to see that -generic fits all than -k8.
-generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
scheme completely, and call the flavo
On Thursday 15 June 2006 00:42, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> -generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
> scheme completely, and call the flavours 2.6.x-y-amd64 and
> 2.6.x-y-em64t respectively.
So what do you choose if you need a kernel that supports both? Both are
non-obv
During apt-get update (and upgrade) I have noticed that also
linux-image-2,6.15.1-amd64-generic
and
linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8,
that I had initially installed, were affected.
What about
linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
that I am currently using?
Should I do something about?
Also, the correct
Forgot to say that etch amd64 is running.
During apt-get update (and upgrade) I have noticed that also
linux-image-2,6.15.1-amd64-generic
and
linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8,
that I had initially installed, were affected.
What about
linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
that I am currently using?
Shoul
26 matches
Mail list logo
