Your message dated Thu, 09 Feb 2006 05:32:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351412: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
linux-2.6_2.6.15-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.15-5.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.15-5.diff.gz
linux-manual-2.6.15_2.6.15-5_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.15_2.6.15-5_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.15_2.6.15-5_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.15_2.6.15-5_all.
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-486_2.6.15-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-486_2.6.15-5_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.15-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.15-5_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.15-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:02:26AM +0100, Christian Henz wrote:
[...]
> I can reproduce the crash by running
> $ jstest /dev/input/js0
>
> If the joypad isn't connected, the crash doesn't occur.
>
Actually that is not true. The crash still occurs with the
joypad disconnected.
Also, I tried it w
With the latest 2.6.15-4 kernel version from debian testing and the
testing udev the problem disappeared.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:51:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346543: Acknowledgement (udev netlink problems with
kernel 2.6.15 on alpha)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Package: linux-source-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-4
Followup-For: Bug #351623
While attempting to upgrade from an older 2.4 series kernel to 2.6.15, I
encountered a very similar bug. I compiled from the source packages using
make-kpkg, but after I got the new kernel to boot, I encountered the
"per
Hallo,
now that 2.6.15-4 is in testing and 2.6.15-5 uploaded, the next release
is already around the corner :-)
The next upstream revision 2.6.15.4 should be released tomorrow, and Waldi
fixed a patch from the last release which requires immediate upload to
restore backwards-compatibility in li
Quoting Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please raise your voice if you have open things you need to add before
2.6.15-6 will be uploaded; we want to make it in time for dinstall
tomorrow.
Two things: first I think that changelog entries like
linux-2.6 (2.6.15-6) unstable; urgency=low
Now that 2.6.15 kernels are in testing I'd like to raise the kernel
requirement for the udev package from 2.6.12 to 2.6.15 as soon as a new
version of udev will have entered testing.
This will let me remove a lot of cruft from the package.
Does anybody have a reason to wait some more time?
--
cia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> Now that 2.6.15 kernels are in testing I'd like to raise the kernel
> requirement for the udev package from 2.6.12 to 2.6.15 as soon as a new
> version of udev will have entered testing.
> This will let me remove a lot of cruft from the package.
> Does an
On Feb 10, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But udev will refuse to start or to install if the running kernel is
> older then it?
As it currently happens, it will either:
- refuse to be upgraded
- be installed but not started if it was not installed yet
- not be started at boot time if
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.034
Severity: important
The current version of make-kpkg calls the kernel's prepare target,
but this does not exist in 2.4.27. Apart from anything else,
this renders all of the 2.4.27 images in etch/sid unbuildable.
I'm not entirely sure what the correct fix is
Package: linux-source-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-5
Severity: minor
There is an unusual file named 'bla' in /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/.
# cat /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/bla
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root85862 Jan 17 08:17 dash_0.5.3-2_i386.deb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10823270 Jan 17 12:47 tetex-extra
severity 352000 important
clone 352000 -1
reassign -1 kernel-package
found -1 10.034
retitle -1 k-p fails to build documentation packages
block 352000 by -1
thanks
Hi,
The packaging of linux-2.6 did not change with respect to documentation,
it appears that problem lies with kernel-package. I wa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 352000 important
Bug#352000: linux-2.6: linux-doc-2.6.x missing?
Severity set to `important'.
> clone 352000 -1
Bug#352000: linux-2.6: linux-doc-2.6.x missing?
Bug 352000 cloned as bug 352169.
> reassign -1 kernel-package
Bug#352169: linux-2.
Investment Times Alert Issues: (S T R O N G B U Y)
Date : 10 February 2006
Company : DARK DYNAMITE INC
S y m b o l : DKDY
Yes, it looks like the momentum has started up again.
Current Price : $1.38
Short Term Target : $4-$8
Recommendation : 200-400%
Sick of hedge funds and flippers getting all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 352000 by 352169
Bug#352000: linux-2.6: linux-doc-2.6.x missing?
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 352169
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:54:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 10, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But udev will refuse to start or to install if the running kernel is
> > older then it?
> As it currently happens, it will either:
> - refuse to be upgraded
> - be installed
19 matches
Mail list logo
