On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:15:22PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:13:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Anyway, i will start with the powerpc situation :
> >
>
> parisc:
> - klibc will work after this patch is applied:
> http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2005-Nov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Marco what about udev ?
Nothing to report, except a few packaging bugs it has been working well.
When 2.6.15 will be in testing I will raise the required kernel version
to 2.6.15 to have proper support for the input subsystem and in-kernel
uevents synthesis.
--
ciao,
Ma
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:13:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
> > a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
> > He pointed out that there are a number of valuable fixes
> > in SVN.
>
> Is there any reason why y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 341014 pending
Bug#341014: broken with udev 0.76
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
tags 341014 pending
stop
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:05:35PM +0100, Heikki Henriksen wrote:
>
> udev 0.76 failed to queue events correctly and didn't populate /dev at
> all using initramfs-tools. I only got a /dev/.udev/failed.
urggs indeed, will need another high urgency upload,
will do this aft
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:12:34AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please, Sven, do not cc me: I am subscribed to the kernel list!
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 02:48:01 +0100
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:53:11AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Marco what about udev ?
> Nothing to report, except a few packaging bugs it has been working well.
> When 2.6.15 will be in testing I will raise the required kernel version
> to 2.6.15 to have proper supp
On Nov 28, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, i saw passing a couple of reports about the ramdisk not creating needed
> devices, which sound RCish for this case, what about those ? Also, more
I discussed these today with Maximilian Attems, initramfs-tools needed
to be updated and now t
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:26:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 28, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, i saw passing a couple of reports about the ramdisk not creating
> > needed
> > devices, which sound RCish for this case, what about those ? Also, more
> I discussed these
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 341076 linux-2.6
Bug#341076: linux-image-2.6.14-2-smp: Kernel crashes on boot with
hyperthreading cpus
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.14-2-smp'
Bug reassigned fro
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:04:59AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:15:22PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:13:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Anyway, i will start with the powerpc situation :
> > >
> >
> > parisc:
> > - klibc will wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 341049 initramfs-tools 0.40
Bug#341049: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Doesn't boot (/dev/hda1 does not exist)
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.14-2-686' to `initramfs-tools'.
> merge 341014 341049
Bug#341014: broken with udev 0.76
Bug#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:21:45 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:12:34AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Ah, so it is same thing as your earlier request for filing
> > bugreports against linux-2.6 for each unk
On Monday 28 November 2005 12:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The following problems are known for yaird currently in sid:
Add:
* Does not work for drivers that don't have sysfs support, like BusLogic
> We do not have _automated_ workarounds, which it seems you imply and I
> clearly didn't above.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 341049 grave
Bug#341049: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Doesn't boot (/dev/hda1 does not exist)
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 341014 341049
Bug#341014: broken with udev 0.76
Bug#341049: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Doesn't boot (/dev/hda1 does not
Thanks Jonas for your detailed report.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:24:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2005 12:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > The following problems are known for yaird currently in sid:
>
> Add:
> * Does not work for drivers that don't have sysfs support, like
Hi,
On Monday 28 November 2005 10:05, Sven Luther wrote:
> ... for a kernel which is aimed at
> going away before the etch release anyway...
I don't think this is true (for debian as a whole). Sorry. Removing 2.4 is not
a etch release goal as defined by the release managers.
And it's also neith
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.14
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: minor
Hello,
I've just compiled a new kernel from
linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-4_all.deb,
and I noticed this includes the official patches 2.6.14.1 up to
2.6.14.3, except from the extraversion. So, by default the new kernel
will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:24:34 +0100
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2005 12:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > The following problems are known for yaird currently in sid:
>
> Add:
> * Does not work for drivers that don't hav
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:08:24PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 28 November 2005 10:05, Sven Luther wrote:
> > ... for a kernel which is aimed at
> > going away before the etch release anyway...
>
> I don't think this is true (for debian as a whole). Sorry. Removing 2.4 is
> n
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:04:12PM +0100, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.14
> Version: 2.6.14-4
> Severity: minor
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just compiled a new kernel from
> linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-4_all.deb,
> and I noticed this includes the official patches 2.6.1
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Linux version 2.6.14-2-powerpc (Debian 2.6.14-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
> version 4.0.3 20051023 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-3.sven.1)) #2 Thu Nov 10
> 11:55:12 UTC 2005
>
> This is mine, for example, and you see that it is 2.6.14-2-p
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Linux version 2.6.14-2-powerpc (Debian 2.6.14-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
> > version 4.0.3 20051023 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-3.sven.1)) #2 Thu Nov 10
> > 11:55:12
reassign 338185 elilo
stop
This is actually a bug in elilo, see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64&m=113315906701976&w=2
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 338185 elilo
Bug#338185: ia64 has problems footprinting initramfs
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `elilo'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:42:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> I've backported the fix for CVE-2005-2709 to 2.4 for Debian's 2.4
> sarge kernel. Below is a patch against 2.4.32, in case one hasn't been
> submitted to you yet. Please apply.
>
> CVE-2005-2709
>
> sysctl.c in Linux kernel before 2
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.84
Severity: important
I cannot get 2.6.12 or 2.6.12 to boot because of the transition from devfs to
udev, and the problem seems to lie with initrd.
The symptom:
* when I boot using devfs=mount, the boot succeeds. I get a "cannot umount
/proc/mount" message
hey Vagrant,
I just root caused an issue w/ the same symptom on ia64. Turns out
the bootloader was passing a bloated initrd_size option to the kernel.
Since initramfs is known to work on x86 w/ other bootloaders, I'm
thinking qemu maybe doing the same thing.
Can you try a test for me?
1) Rebui
hey Paul,
Would it be possible for you to include your full bootlog?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
initramfs-tools_0.41_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.41.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.41.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.41_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:59:34PM -0600, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> I cannot get 2.6.12 or 2.6.12 to boot because of the transition from
> devfs to udev, and the problem seems to lie with initrd.
>
initrd-tools is phasing out, if you use testing and udev 0.74
pick initramfs-tools 0.40 from unstabl
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: important
The mptspi module is required for at least some machines that use the mptscsih
driver for the root device.
Please bzr merge http://dannf.org/bzr/initramfs-tools
(I'm new to bzr - is this the appropriate way to send you a patch?)
-- System Information
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 21:21 -0500, Graham Knap wrote:
> Sure enough, the kernel now boots. I'll attach the "dmesg" output here.
>
> Do you guys have a "final" patch in mind?
>
> Let me know if there are other tests you'd like me to run. Now that I
> know how to do this, I should be able to turn a
Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339093: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.41
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341014: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.41
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341014: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.41
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.40
--
This email is automatically generated.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.41.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.41.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.41.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.41.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.41_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.41_all.deb
Announcing to debian-deve
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 21:21 -0500, Graham Knap wrote:
Sure enough, the kernel now boots. I'll attach the "dmesg" output here.
Do you guys have a "final" patch in mind?
Let me know if there are other tests you'd like me to run. Now that I
know how to do this, I should be
tags 341162 patch
thanks
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:20:18PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> The mptspi module is required for at least some machines that use the mptscsih
> driver for the root device.
>
> Please bzr merge http://dannf.org/bzr/initramfs-tools
>
> (I'm new to bzr - is this the app
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 341162 patch
Bug#341162: initramfs-tools: add mptspi module
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:26:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Nov 28, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, i saw passing a couple of reports about the ramdisk not creating
> > > needed
> > > devices, which sound RCish for this ca
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:04:59AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > currently waiting for a patch from svenl to build against
> > linux-kernel-headers, status?
>
> Nope, sorry, i had no real time to investigate this more than i did, and my
> tests didn
/* Sorry for not replying to original message, looks like I've lost it */
The quirks I'm aware of:
* The perpetual l-h problem: #340486. The build of modules breaks in
scripts/basic directory. Since I've contributed the latest "fix" for
scripts, I'm looking into it. At the moment I'm not even
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On 07 Oct 2005 at 13h10, Horms wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I took a look at making a backport, and it seems that
> > some of the problems are there, but without a deeper inspection
> > of the code its difficult to tell if the problems manif
At 14:01 2005-11-28, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:59:34PM -0600, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> I cannot get 2.6.12 or 2.6.12 to boot because of the transition from
> devfs to udev, and the problem seems to lie with initrd.
>
initrd-tools is phasing out, if you use testing and u
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:42:34PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> /* Sorry for not replying to original message, looks like I've lost it */
>
> The quirks I'm aware of:
>
> * The perpetual l-h problem: #340486. The build of modules breaks in
> scripts/basic directory. Since I've contributed the la
47 matches
Mail list logo
