Re: version/infrastructure separation test ...

2005-11-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:54:31AM +, Horms wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:07:24AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > Yes and no. The problem is that basically we have two different things, the > > first one is the build infrastructure, which should rea

Re: version/infrastructure separation test ...

2005-11-09 Thread Horms
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:07:24AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > Yes and no. The problem is that basically we have two different things, the > first one is the build infrastructure, which should really not be all that > different for each version, and which there

Re: version/infrastructure separation test ...

2005-11-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:07:24AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 04:48:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As you may have noticed, i did some tests to illustrate my proposal to split > > the infrastructure out of the real packaging, which you can find at : > > > >

Re: version/infrastructure separation test ...

2005-11-08 Thread Horms
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 04:48:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may have noticed, i did some tests to illustrate my proposal to split > the infrastructure out of the real packaging, which you can find at : > > svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/test > > The layout is as f

version/infrastructure separation test ...

2005-11-08 Thread Sven Luther
Hi all, As you may have noticed, i did some tests to illustrate my proposal to split the infrastructure out of the real packaging, which you can find at : svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/test The layout is as follows : linux/infrastructure/debian <- contains the common stuff. linu