Re: svn games

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Bastian Blank wrote: > > >As I said, an abiname bump is a last resort solution and needs to be > >coordinated. Frederik and I currently coordinate the uploads and other > >core changes. So I think we have the right to veto such probl

Re: svn games

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Bastian Blank wrote: As I said, an abiname bump is a last resort solution and needs to be coordinated. Frederik and I currently coordinate the uploads and other core changes. So I think we have the right to veto such problematic changes. I'm not interested in the discussio

Re: svn games

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:32:47PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would like to bring the following recent svn commits to the > attention of the team. I have made a commit r6880 in Saturday morning > (Pacific time): > Switch to gcc-4.1 for sparc, because it works (tm). This was after the 2.6

Re: svn games

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:32:47PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to bring the following recent svn commits to the > attention of the team. I have made a commit r6880 in Saturday morning > (Pacific time): > > Switch to gcc-4.1 for sparc, because it works (tm). Hi all, ..

Re: svn games

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After repeating my question a few times, I was able to deduce from > Bastian's one-word replies that he talked to someone else on > ftp-master team and was assured that the rejection of sparc binaries > was still possible. Bastian tends to ignore uncomfortable question

svn games

Hi, I would like to bring the following recent svn commits to the attention of the team. I have made a commit r6880 in Saturday morning (Pacific time): Switch to gcc-4.1 for sparc, because it works (tm). This commit was neccessary because the 2.6.17-1 kernel was uploaded by Bastian on Friday, d