Re: sid abi changes

2010-03-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 19:32 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by > a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? Hi maks, Looks like you did this bump in r15232 and removed debian/abi/2.6.32-2 but didn't add debian/abi/2.6.32-3 --

Re: sid abi changes

2010-02-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 23:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > > just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by > > > a long mess (see below). a

Re: sid abi changes

2010-02-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by > > a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? > > Yes. and why? please add reason, late

Re: sid abi changes

2010-02-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by > a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? Yes. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri