On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:57:04PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Christian T. Steigies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050416 00:30]:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > > Right now I'd like to build from kernel-tree 2.4.27-10, thanks
>
> > I finally updated the m68k packages
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> I looked at malo and voltaire, both seem to be busy, presumably
> acting as buildds, and there is also the problem of installing
> kernel-tree, as I don't have root. In short, if you could make a machine
> available that would be most excelle
* Christian T. Steigies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050416 00:30]:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Right now I'd like to build from kernel-tree 2.4.27-10, thanks
> I finally updated the m68k packages to use the kernel-tree package. If I
> want to upload this, built against
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I looked at malo and voltaire, both seem to be busy, presumably
> acting as buildds, and there is also the problem of installing
> kernel-tree, as I don't have root. In short, if
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Right now I'd like to build from kernel-tree 2.4.27-10, thanks
I finally updated the m68k packages to use the kernel-tree package. If I
want to upload this, built against k-t-2.4.27-9 (or 10?), these packages
should not go into sarge? Did y
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Are there debian machines
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:11:54PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > I may be able to provide a pegasos box to who
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I may be able to provide a pegasos box to whoever decides to take over
> > > this
> > > burden, but can't
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I may be able to provide a pegasos box to whoever decides to take over
> > this
> > burden, but can't promise anything. Do you volunteer for that ?
>
> I am happy to buil
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Are there debian machines
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Ok, I'll try and be a little more specific. Do you know of any
> > machines that are available to kernel team members, or more
> > generally debian developers, to do ppc buil
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Ok, I'll try and be a little more specific. Do you know of any
> machines that are available to kernel team members, or more
> generally debian developers, to do ppc builds?
trick.rz.uni-augsburg.de, a power5 machine, is open on request.
B
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Are there debian machines that are suitable for doing such a build
> > > should the need arise? It s
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[snip]
> > Are there debian machines that are suitable for doing such a build
> > should the need arise? It seems that if it is just a matter of running
> > a build and watching
Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
[..]
Plans on my part for 2.6 powerpc kernels are :
1) abandonement of the ppc32 power3 and power4 kernels in favour of ppc64
variants.
mkay, this looks bad to my eyes.
Does this mean that there is no more support for these variants in
upstream, also? I have a Power
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 12:13:31AM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
>
> [..]
>
> >Plans on my part for 2.6 powerpc kernels are :
> >
> > 1) abandonement of the ppc32 power3 and power4 kernels in favour of ppc64
> > variants.
> >
>
> mkay, this looks bad to my eye
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:15:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > It seems as the 2.4.27
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:15:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release
> > > candidates
> > > a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:15:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
> > are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
> > a
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
> are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
> and problems present in them, and maybe even some security issues wh
Dropping debian-boot, as i don't think further discussion concerns them.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:58:05AM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > Plans on my part for 2.6 powerpc kernels are :
> >
> > 1) abandonement of the ppc32 power3 and power4 kernels in favour of ppc64
> > variants.
>
> Fi
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 09:58 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> As I said above, some embedded CPU really need different mm handling.
> BookE is an abomination, and fun with the 64 bit BookE implemetations
> if they come one day: they use different instruction encoding than
> standard PPC64.
I think
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
> are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
> and problems present in them, and maybe even some security issues wh
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
and problems present in them, and maybe even some security issues which will
not be fixed in d-i, but only in testing/stable-security-updat
24 matches
Mail list logo
